Navigation

RSS 2.0 Subscribe via RSS

Search

On this page

(BN) Emerging-Nation Bond Rout Reduces Sales by 72%
US Home Refinance Activity Surges Higher
Brazil Credit Growth & Loan Deliquency Data August 2011
ECB Balance Sheet Update
Consumer Confidence September 2011
US New Home Sales August 2011 Data
Gold
Silver
(BMP) Moody's: Credit Card Delinquencies Decline to New Low
Global YTD Returns
EM Currency Volatility
ECB Balance Sheet
Euro Stress Measures
(BN) Federal Open Market Committee Sept. 21 Statement: Full Text
Our Thoughts Ahead of the FOMC Meeting
Existing Home Sales
EM Currencies
(SPC) X-S&P; Raises LC Ratings On Turkey To 'BBB-/A-3'
NDX Index New Highs
Copper
Emerging Market Currencies
University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment September 2011
Reserve Bank of India Raises Rates
Euro-Stress Update
Philly Fed September 2011
ECB, FRB et al to Introduce USD Lending Facility
Initial Claims Data
NDX Index
Eurozone and US Financial Stress
(BN) Rupee Pares Loss From 2-Year Low on Intervention
ECB Balance Sheet September 9, 2011
Silver
China Money Supply and Loan Data
(GO5) ECB: 9 September 2011 - Jürgen Stark Resigns
China Economic Statistics August 2011
(BV) A Layman’s Guide to the President’s Jobs Speech
Initial Claims Data
SPX Index and Year End Consensus
(BN) Lower Rents Driving U.S. Retailers to Expand
Bloomberg Financial Conditions Index
ISM Non-Manufacturing Survey August 2011
Non-Farm Payroll August 2011
Euro-zone Yields
ISM Manufacturing Report August 2011
US Initial Claims Data
Brazil Cuts SELIC Rate to 12.00%

Archive

Disclaimer
Opinions expressed are subject to change at any time, are not guaranteed, and are not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

Send mail to the author(s) E-mail

Total Posts: 2708
This Year: 495
This Month: 4
This Week: 0
Comments: 0

Sign In

# Wednesday, 28 September 2011
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 10:45:37 AM

One of our major concerns going into the summer was that an abrupt sell-off in
emerging market corporate credit (especially in local currency debt) would lead
to a shut-down of new issuance. Early evidence suggests that this is exactly
the path that the market is taking, with the attached story giving useful
detail to the situation.

Our belief is that emerging market growth (in both the consumer and corporate
sectors) has become very dependent on new credit issuance over the last 24
months. Should the supply of new credit remain restricted for a number of
months this can be expected to act as a significant negative force on local
economic activity.



more...
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Emerging-Nation Bond Rout Reduces Sales by 72%: Credit Markets
2011-09-28 10:09:21.326 GMT


By Jason Webb and John Glover
Sept. 28 (Bloomberg) -- Emerging-market companies are
selling the fewest bonds in 2 1/2 years as investors drive
borrowing costs higher amid a global economic slowdown.
Borrowers in developing nations issued $16 billion of
fixed-income securities since the end of June, a 72 percent
decrease from $58 billion in the previous quarter and the least
since the first three months of 2009, according to data compiled
by Bloomberg. Prices of emerging-market corporate notes are down
4.7 percent, the biggest drop since the 20 percent rout after
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. collapsed in September 2008,
JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s Composite Corporate EMBI Index shows.
Brazilian beef producer Rodopa Exportacao de Alimentos &
Logistica Ltda and YPF SA, Argentina’s biggest energy company,
pulled bond sales amid speculation that Greece’s failure to pay
its debts may trigger a global recession. Issuers in developing
countries are vulnerable to Europe’s crisis because they borrow
three times as much from the region’s banks as from U.S. and
Japanese lenders, Bank for International Settlements data show.
“For emerging-market borrowers, access to international
markets is hugely important because they aren’t able to fund on
domestic markets in the scale they want,” said Stuart
Culverhouse, the chief economist of broker Exotix Ltd. in London.
“There’s been a massive retreat from risk.”

Rising Yields

Yields on emerging-market company debt have jumped 88 basis
points during the third quarter to 6.68 percent, the biggest
increase since the end of 2008, JPMorgan’s Corporate EMBI
Composite Blended Yield index shows. The rate is the highest
since February 2010, meaning it costs a borrower an extra
$880,000 a year in interest for every $100 million of debt sold.
The percentage decline in emerging-market bond issuance is
bigger than for global corporate borrowers, which offered $520.9
billion this quarter, down about 43 percent from $916.8 billion
in the second, Bloomberg data show.
Elsewhere in credit markets, McDonald’s Corp. and Qwest
Corp. led at least $8.22 billion in U.S. corporate bond sales on
the busiest day for issuance in almost two weeks as optimism
grew that Europe’s debt crisis may be contained. A benchmark
gauge of U.S. corporate credit risk fell for a third day.
Microsemi Corp. set the rate on an $800 million term loan it’s
seeking to finance an acquisition.
Bonds of Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America
Corp. were the most actively traded U.S. corporate securities by
dealers, with 180 trades of $1 million or more, according to
Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority.

McDonald’s, Qwest

McDonald’s, the world’s largest restaurant chain, sold $500
million of 2.625 percent notes due in January 2022 that yield 78
basis points more than similar-maturity Treasuries, Bloomberg
data show. Denver-based Qwest, a unit of CenturyLink Inc.,
issued $950 million of 6.75 percent debt maturing in December
2021.
Corporate bond offerings rebounded after falling last week
to $1.7 billion, the lowest level this year, with U.S. Treasury
Secretary Timothy Geithner predicting that European governments
will use more force to resolve the region’s crisis. Companies
from 3M Co. to AES Corp. issued $3.2 billion of debt yesterday,
Bloomberg data show.
“Issuers were waiting for a day or two of stability,”
Timothy Cox, executive director of debt capital markets at
Mizuho Securities USA Inc. in New York, said in a telephone
interview. “We’re going to be looking back at these yields and
every treasurer’s going to wish they issued at these levels.”

Markit CDX Index

The Markit CDX North America Investment Grade Index, which
typically falls as investor confidence improves and rises as it
deteriorates, declined 0.6 basis point to a mid-price of 136.3
basis points, according to Markit Group Ltd.
The Markit iTraxx Europe Index of credit-default swaps
linked to 125 companies with investment-grade ratings fell 2.75
to 187.75, according to JPMorgan at 11 a.m. in London.
In the Asia-Pacific region, the Markit iTraxx Asia index of
40 investment-grade borrowers outside Japan jumped 8 basis
points to 228.5 basis points, Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc
prices show. The Markit iTraxx Australia index rose 4 to 207,
Westpac Banking Corp. prices show.
Credit swaps pay the buyer face value if a borrower fails
to meet its obligations, less the value of the defaulted debt. A
basis point equals $1,000 annually on a contract protecting $10
million of debt.

Leveraged Loans

The Standard & Poor’s/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 index
snapped three days of declines, rising 0.12 cent to 89.22 cents
on the dollar. The measure, which tracks the 100 largest dollar-
denominated first-lien leveraged loans, has climbed from 87.47
cents on Aug. 26, which was the lowest since December 2009.
Microsemi, an Irvine, California-based maker of microchips
for the aerospace and defense industries, set the rate on the
term loan B it’s seeking to finance its purchase of Zarlink
Semiconductor Inc., a person with knowledge of the transaction
said.
The debt will pay 4.25 percentage points to 4.5 percentage
points more than the London interbank offered rate, said the
person, who declined to be identified because the terms are
private. Libor, a rate banks charge to lend to each other, will
have a 1.25 percent floor.
Leveraged loans and high-yield bonds are rated below Baa3
by Moody’s Investors Service and lower than BBB- at S&P.

Emerging Markets

In emerging markets, relative yields fell from the highest
level in more than two years yesterday. The JPMorgan EMBI Global
index declined 12 basis points to 446 basis points, or 4.46
percentage points, snapping six days of increases. The gauge
rose 2 basis points to 448 as of 9:29 a.m. in Hong Kong.
European banks had $3.4 trillion in loans to emerging-
market borrowers as of the end of March, compared with $299
billion from Japanese lenders and $727 billion by U.S. financial
institutions, according to the Basel-based BIS’s Quarterly
Review published Sept. 18. Eastern Europe’s share of the debt
provided by European lenders was $1.3 trillion, compared with
$890 billion for emerging Asia and $486 billion for Latin
America.
Rodopa, the maker of Tatuibi meat products, put off plans
to sell as much as $100 million in five-year dollar bonds
because of the European crisis, Chief Executive Officer Sergio
Longo said in interview on Sept. 23. YPF postponed its $300
million debt sale on July 18, three days after Celulosa
Argentina SA, the nation’s second-largest pulp maker, called off
a $150 million deal.

Eastern Europe

“The market remains effectively broken at the moment, and
it’s not an environment to issue in,” James Croft, the head of
emerging-market fixed income at Mitsubishi UFJ Securities in
London, said
Yields on corporate bonds in the U.S. rose 8 basis points
in the quarter to 3.97 percent yesterday, according to Bank of
America Merrill Lynch’s U.S. Corporate Master Index. In Europe,
corporate note yields climbed 42 basis points to 4.47 percent,
according to the firm’s EMU Corporate Index.
Bonds of companies in Eastern Europe, whose biggest export
markets are in the euro region, are leading the declines in bond
prices, JPMorgan’s Corporate EMBI Europe Index shows. Industrial
companies are also underperforming, wiping out all of this
year’s gains this month, according to JPMorgan’s Corporate EMBI
Industrials Index.
The International Monetary Fund cut its forecast on Sept.
20 for global growth and predicted “severe” repercussions if
Europe fails to contain its debt crisis or U.S. policy makers
deadlock over a fiscal plan.

‘Trepidation’

The world economy will expand 4 percent this year and next,
the IMF said, compared with June forecasts of 4.3 percent in
2011 and of 4.5 percent in 2012. The IMF predicts growth of 6.4
percent in developing economies this year and 6.1 percent next
year, down from 6.6 percent and 6.4 percent forecast in June.
The largest economies from China to the U.S. are already
slowing, resulting in less demand for raw materials and consumer
goods. Nations from Brazil to Turkey have reduced interest rates
in an attempt to make their goods cheaper and bolster growth.
Brazil cut its main rate by 50 basis points to 12 percent
on Aug. 31, while Turkey lowered borrowing costs to a record-low
5.75 percent at an unscheduled meeting on Aug. 4.
Policy makers in Europe “finally” understand the severity
of the region’s sovereign-debt crisis and the actions that need
to be taken, Pacific Investment Management Co. Chief Executive
Officer Mohamed El-Erian said in a radio interview with Tom
Keene and Ken Prewitt on “Bloomberg Surveillance.” Pimco is
the world’s biggest manager of bond funds. “They recognize they
have deep problems and they recognize they need to do something
about it,” he said.
Europe’s crisis has spawned as much as 300 billion euros
($408 billion) of credit risk for the region’s banks, the IMF
said last week. Greece, Ireland and Portugal have already sought
international bailouts and speculation is increasing that the
next countries to fall will be Spain and Italy.
“We’re seeing a deteriorating global economic outlook,
with fiscal issues in the U.S. and sovereign and bank problems
in Europe,” said Nick Chamie, the global head of emerging-
market research at RBC Dominion Securities Inc. in Toronto.
“These are causing significant angst among investors. There is
a great deal of trepidation about putting new money to work in
emerging markets.”

For Related News and Information:
New Issues Monitor: NIM <GO>
Top Bond stories: TOP BON <GO>
Credit market wraps: NI CMW <GO>

--With assistance from Michael Amato, Tim Catts, Zeke Faux and
John Parry in New York and Shelley Smith in Hong Kong. Editors:
Paul Armstrong, Alan Goldstein

To contact the reporters on this story:
Jason Webb in London at +44-20-7073-3466 or
[email protected];
John Glover in London at +44-20-7073-3563 or
[email protected]

To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Gavin Serkin at +44-20-7673-2467 or
[email protected];
Paul Armstrong at +44-20-7330-7185 or
[email protected]

collapse
| | # 
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:34:54 AM

Up until this week, one of the unique aspects of this summer's "crisis"
was that it had not been accompanied by the usual wave in refinancing
activity. Normally as risk markets undergo turmoil, the flight of capital
into the US Treasury market leads to sharply lower mortgage rates and
creates a window of opportunity to bring mortgage costs lower. Because of
the very low rates recorded last summer and early fall in the run-up to
QE2, it had not been until recent weeks that mortgage pricing had reached
the point that it created sufficient incentive to undergo refinancing.
However, as the attached chart shows, the collapse in yields surrounding
the announcement of "Operation Twist" has caused the MBA Refi index to
push back above the key 4000 level that we use to designate a "refi boom",
This also helps explains a portion of last week's move lower by treasury
yields since all anecdotal evidence suggests that very few MBS holders
were prepared for this eventuality (one of the most profitable trades in
the first half of 2011 was the use of mortgage derivatives that performed
well in the absence of refi activity) and we would expect that a fair
amount of duration re-balancing took place as the long end of the curve
collapsed lower, increasing the already strong demand in the marketplace.

Meanwhile for those able to take advantage of current rates, current yields
will take another bite out of the portion of disposable income used for
shelter, increasing income for other discretionary spending and/or
savings. This has always been the silver lining of a deep US correction in
risk assets and it is a useful positive force for the key consumer sector
going into the last quarter of 2011. - D-MBAVREFI_Index.gif -

| | # 
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:15:57 AM

Yesterday afternoon's report on August Brazil Loan Data showed that credit
growth remained robust in August, while loan delinquency continues to
deteriorate at a fairly rapid pace. Total Private Sector loans grew by 1.41% to
$1,089 bln. This caused a moderate slowing in the annual growth rate to 19.59%,
but still suggests that credit growth is running well above actual economic
activity. Housing Credit continues to grow much faster than overall loans,
rising 3.73% in August and maintaining its annual growth rate of just under
50%. Housing credit now accounts for 16.5% of outstanding credit up from
approximately 7.5% in 2007. Meanwhile loans due 90+ days rose to 6.7%,
their highest level since May 2008 and a full percentage point higher than
the start of the year. Note that this means that delinquency growth is now
well over 20% per annum (as measured by the change of aggregate loans in
default), and this is with employment still at a cycle high.

Since August the local central bank has chosen to cut interest rates, in
response to a collapse of local equity values and growing concerns
regarding the strength of the economy. Clearly this left the task of
reining in credit growth largely unfinished (or even "un-started"). We
would expect the central bank to keep its macro-prudential measures aimed
directly at credit growth intact until some clear signs of a slowdown are
in evidence. Of course any slowing in credit growth will lead to a surge in
the delinquency rate which even under current conditions is set to trip
over the problematic 7.00% level that would represent a significant
problem in loan defaults sometime around the turn of the year. We continue
to believe that Brazil will be a source of troubling macro data well into
2012. - D-BZLNPTOT_Index.gif - D-BRCDDEFT_Index.gif -

| | # 
# Tuesday, 27 September 2011
Tuesday, September 27, 2011 12:34:11 PM

The ECB Balance sheet expanded by a further 2.12% last week, further
raising our suspicion that a silent enactment of quantitative easing via
"benign neglect" is taking place under the noses of those hectoring the
ECB to loosen monetary policy (we would happily include ourselves in this
number). The ECB's sterilization auctions have failed to keep pace with
sovereign bond purchases and as a result the balance sheet
has now grown by over 12% over the last 13 weeks (red line on balance sheet
chart) and grew by just over 5% in September alone.

This is a fairly significant change in the direction of Eurozone liquidity
conditions although the silence by ECB officials makes it hard to gauge the
level of intention behind it. We do not judge it to be sufficient to bring this
episode to a close but we would imagine that the provision of liquidity has
eased stress at the margins. It does also increase the probability that in the
end the ECB will capitulate and that the internal debate is now focused on the
details of a monetary easing program rather than whether it is required.

As would be expected this has led to some stabilizing of the sovereign
credit market, with Spanish bonds in particular acting somewhat better in
recent sessions, with the key 10 year yield moving back down to test the
5% level. Interestingly there has been no such improvement in Italian bond
yields, leading to a fairly sizeable positive spread between Italian and
Spanish yields. This is the first time since the EU sovereign debt crisis
commenced in April 2010 that Spain and Italy have traded in line with
their historical relationship (Italy has always been assumed to be a
somewhat worse credit). This brings up the intriguing possibility that if
it continues to make fiscal progress Spain may be able to drop off the
"acute" list of countries although there would still be a great deal of
work needed to bring yields closer to even French treasuries (still 230 bp
below Spain) let alone Germany (304 bp). - W-.ECB-GOLD_Index.gif -
D-GBTPGR10_Index.gif -

| | # 
Tuesday, September 27, 2011 10:38:32 AM

The Conference Board Survey of Consumer Confidence showed essentially no change
in September with the overall index nudging from 45.20 to 45.40. There was a
little more deterioration in the Present Situation index which fell to 32.50
while the Expectations index rose slightly to 54. Again we view these
fluctuations as irrelevant.

Given that correction in global risk assets has remained in force over the last
month (and actually broadened to include commodities and emerging market
currencies) it is unsurprising that consumer confidence remains depressed,
since it tends to be very sensitive to financial market performance over the
prior few weeks. Fortunately it is much less indicative of actual consumer
activity. Once more all the anecdotal evidence suggests that September has been
a solid month for retail sales, including that of relatively high ticket items
such as automobiles and we would expect this divergence between confidence
measures and consumer activity to remain in place until this long corrective
phase has run its course. - consumerconfidenceseptember11.gif

| | # 
# Monday, 26 September 2011
Monday, September 26, 2011 2:06:48 PM

The August New Home Sales surprised no-one with another dismal set of data
showing sales stuck at 295K, just beating consensus estimates of 293K. July's
data was revised slightly higher to 302K but overall the report simply told us
what we already knew, which is that no recovery in new home sales took place in
2011. If there is any solace it is in the fact that sales appear to have
troughed with the data bouncing along the bottom for the last 18 months.

As can be seen on the attached chart the rolling 60 month ma has now recorded a
new low of 497.98 and will certainly trend lower for several months as the 2006
and early 2007 data falls out of the calculation. As has been the case for many
months the sole positive data came from inventories which fell to yet another
all time low at 162K. Although the seasonal adjustment process may create
some upside surprise in the data over the next few months it is next spring at
the earliest that the long awaited recovery in the US New Home market can be
expected to occur. In the meantime the industry will continue to muddle through
with the same resourcefulness that has kept many public builders solvent
through the most difficult period on record for their industry.

| | # 
Monday, September 26, 2011 11:34:55 AM

We warned earlier last week that copper breaking down below key support at
$8,500 was potentially a very bad sign for the commodity complex. This was
borne out by subsequent losses for copper (now trading at $7,069, well
below our own aggressive downside target of $7,500) followed by silver
which collapsed at the end of last week and has followed through this
morning to trade as low as $26.07 this morning before recovering to $28.31
(still down 9.00% for the day).

However, deep as these losses are, they pale into significance behind those
of gold which has been the primary destination for "safe haven" capital
over the last 18 months. As recently as last Wednesday evening, gold was
still above its 50 day ma at $1,782 giving the illusion of technical
strength during a troubled market. This protection was stripped away over
the next three sessions with gold plunging as low as $1,532 during the
overnight session when it would appear that margin related selling in one
or more Asian market forced prices sharply lower. The metal has staged
something of a recovery this morning and is currently trading around the
$1595 level for a loss of over 10% since Wednesday night. It is important
to note that last night's collapse in price took the metal through key
long term support at the 150 day ma, a level which has only been breached
during one intra-day session since January 2009 close to the start of
gold's parabolic run up from just over $682 to its recent high of
$1921.15, 280% its post Lehman trough. Most observers will be focused on
the 200 day ma which comes in at $1527.80 and therefore has not been
violated. Although we recognize the almost universal popularity of this
measure (and would admit it still has relevance) it has not been the key
trend indicator for gold, which bounced off its 150 day ma during several
prior brief corrections over the last 32 months (see longer term chart).
This morning's decline therefore has significant longer term implications
for gold, although we would prefer to see the measure violated during the
more densely populate US session and confirmed by a close below this level
before making any definitive conclusion.

Clearly gold's decline could not have been worse timed with regard to the
end of the quarter. It will place a great deal of additional pressure on
managers and investors who had relied on gold's strong gains to balance
awful performance elsewhere in the portfolio. This is particularly true of
investors that matched a concentrated holding in either Financials or
emerging market equity and debt instruments, both of which areas have been a
popular combination to hold with a concentrated position in gold.

| | # 
# Friday, 23 September 2011
Friday, September 23, 2011 11:47:56 AM

We warned readers a couple of weeks ago that silver was in danger of
breaking down and pointed out the similarity of the metal's performance in
2011 to that of the NDX in 2000 (which itself was a mirror of the NKY
index in 1989/90). Recent days have borne out our concerns with the metal
collapsing abruptly to reach $32.50. This is very much "last ditch"
support for the metal, representing the level reached in the first wave of
the decline. If the metal follows the NDX index's 2000 path it could enjoy a
brief and powerful rally back as high as the $40 - $45 range (perhaps on the
back of the ECB finally starting the printing presses) but even this move would
be a last gasp recovery before a much deeper correction took hold.

It is of course possible that silver will now trace out its own path, with the
metal looking for deeper support at either $30 or $27.50 before enjoying
some respite. In the end we are not sure that the shorter term path will
matter a great deal. Silver's explosive 10 year move from $4 to $50 looks
to have decisively ended with the metal now 6 months into what should
prove to be a long and painful bear market, albeit one punctuated by brief
and powerful rallies. - D-SILV_Comdty.gif -

| | # 
Friday, September 23, 2011 10:26:17 AM

In recent weeks the considerable "mission creep" by the rating agencies into
political prognosticators has brought them into deserved disrepute but this
should not obscure their usefulness as a source of timely information on credit
trends since they are far better at reporting the past than predicting the
future (unfortunately they are largely paid for and relied upon for the latter).

Attached is today's report on US Credit Card Delinquency which underlines that
the 22 month improvement in delinquency remained intact in August. This is
important since we view consumer credit metrics as an important counterbalance
to official employment data since they are very sensitive to a genuine
deterioration of employment. No such deterioration was visible in August and
the report suggests that the US consumer if financially well positioned to
indulge in the traditional heavy shopping period between September and December.



more...
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Moody's: Credit card delinquencies decline to yet another new
2011-09-23 14:19:04.354 GMT



Jeffrey Hibbs Luisa De Gaetano
Asst Vice President - Analyst VP - Senior Credit Officer
Structured Finance Group Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service,
Inc.
250 Greenwich Street New
York, NY 10007 U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653



Moody's: Credit card delinquencies decline to yet another new low




New York, September 23, 2011 -- The credit card delinquency rate declined
to yet another all-time low in August, with only 3.04% of credit card
balances 30 days or more past due, according Moody's Credit Card Index.
Credit card charge-offs also improved in August, to 6.02%, ticking down
seven basis points from July.

Moody's expects the charge-off rate index to fall to below 4% by the end
of 2012. The charge-off rate measures those credit card account balances
written off as uncollectible as an annualized percentage of the total
outstanding principal balance.

"The delinquency rate has declined steadily for 22 months, and it's now
well less than half the 6.23% it reached in October 2009," says Moody's
Assistant Vice President Jeffrey Hibbs.

Early-stage delinquencies saw a slight uptick in August, however, to
0.86%, from the all-time low of 0.83% in July.

"We expect seasonal trends to persist in the coming months and result in
flat to slightly higher early-stage delinquencies, even though the
underlying credit of cardholders remains historically strong," adds Hibbs.

The delinquency rate measures the proportion of account balances for which
a monthly payment is more than 30 days late as a percentage of the total
outstanding principal balance. The early-stage delinquency rate measures
the proportion of account balances for which a monthly payment is between
30-59 days late as a percentage of total outstanding principal balance.

Cardholder payment rates, which are a good proxy for cardholders'
willingness and ability to pay down their credit card debt, reached
another all-time high in August at 21.91%.

"Historically low delinquencies in general and high payment rates reflect
the improved borrower mix in credit card trusts today, as weak borrowers
charged off at record levels in the recent recession, and originators
have added few new accounts to the securitizations," says Hibbs.

The payment rate measures the average amount of principal that cardholders
repay each month, as a percentage of total outstanding principal balance.

The yield index bounced back above 20% in August, but the expiration of
principal discounting, whereby issuers re-characterize a portion of
principal collections as finance-charge collections, will continue to
erode this index for the remainder of the year.

Yield is the annualized percentage of income, primarily in the form of
finance charges and fees, collected during the month as a percentage of
total loans.

The excess spread index remained above 11% and near its all-time high, as
the uptick in yield, combined with improvement in the charge-off rate,
contributed to the increase in excess spread.

Excess spread is a measure of the overall performance of securitized pools
of credit card receivables.

Moody's latest Credit Card Index, "Moody's: Credit Card Charge-Offs,
Delinquencies Continue Improvement In August," is available at
www.moodys.com.

In addition, Moody's publishes a weekly summary of structured finance
credit, ratings and methodologies, available to all registered users of
our website, on www.moodys.com/SFQuickCheck.

***

NOTE TO JOURNALISTS ONLY: For more information, please call one of our
global press information hotlines: New York +1-212-553-0376, London
+44-20-7772-5456, Tokyo +813-5408-4110, Hong Kong +852-3758-1350, Sydney
+61-2-9270-8141, Mexico City 001-888-779-5833, São Paulo 0800-891-2518,
or Buenos Aires 0800-666-3506. You can also email us at
[email protected] or visit our web site at www.moodys.com.







Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

© 2011 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors
and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.




CREDIT RATINGS ARE MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC.'S ("MIS")
CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES,
CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES.
MIS DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL,
FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS
IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER
RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK,
MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS ARE
NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS DO
NOT CONSTITUTE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS
ARE NOT RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR
SECURITIES. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF
AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MIS ISSUES ITS CREDIT
RATINGS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL
MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION
FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.



ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION
MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER
TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED
OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE,
IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER,
BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information
contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to
be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or
mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information
contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind.
MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses
in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources
MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate,
independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S
is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or
validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances
shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss
or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or
relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance
or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its
directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with
the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis,
interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of
any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special,
consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including
without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised
in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the
use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings,
financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations,
if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are,
and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements
of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities.
Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study
and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding
or selling. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO
THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY
OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION
OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.



MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's
Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt
securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures,
notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have,
prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal
and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500
to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also
maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's
ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations
that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and
between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported
to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%,
is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder
Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder
Affiliation Policy."



Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate,
Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which
holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969.
This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within
the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing
to access this document from within Australia, you represent to
MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative
of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you
represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its
contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the
Corporations Act 2001.



Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after
October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are
MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities,
credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities.
In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed
to be replaced with "MJKK".

MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's
Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's
Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of MCO.



This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt
obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer
or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision
based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your
financial or other professional adviser.

end

Provider ID: 00595562
-0- Sep/23/2011 14:19 GMT

collapse
| | # 
Friday, September 23, 2011 9:36:56 AM

Today's headlines include the news that the MSCI World Index has declined
20% from its peak triggering a mathematical definition of a "bear market"
decline. As ever the devil is in the details. Portions of the world do
appear to have entered a bear market, by which we mean the dominant force
will be towards lower prices and that the 2010 or 2011 highs will not be
re-seen for a significant period of time. This would include most emerging
markets, EM proxies (such as Australia) and Euro-zone indexes. We would
add to this US large financial companies and possibly commodity related
equities (where it is too early to be sure). However, we base this comment
not on a scan of the charts but because the decline in these portions of
the global market confirms a fundamental deterioration (most obviously in
monetary conditions) that started several months ago and which we highlighted
throughout the first half of 2011.

On the other hand large portions of the US equity market are still
experiencing what can only be termed a normal correction. Most clearly the
consumer discretionary sectors and their intersection with technology have
been extremely robust and this strong market performance has been backed
up by decent corporate earnings right up to the present day. We use the
NDX index as a proxy for this combination at even after yesterday's decline the
index was down -1.5% on the year. Although the NDX will remain vulnerable
to the global downdraft while it remains in place, its losses should remain
a fraction of those encountered elsewhere, even before currency
fluctuations are taken into account. Furthermore the index is likely to lead
the recovery in equity values that will come when some credible shift in
policy is forced upon the ECB and Europe's political establishment.

As the attached chart shows, the global financial marketplace has actually
showed discernment in its behavior, with the greatest year to date losses
(on a currency adjusted basis) now located in the emerging market complex.
As of last night's close the MSCI Emerging Market index was down over 27%
for the year and has lost further ground this morning. Germany's DAX is
down 23.5% in local terms (the EUR is essentially unchanged against the
USD for 2011). In contrast the SPX is down 10.19% (even after the 27%
collapse by the large financial sector and 20% decline in Materials) and
the NDX index 1.5%. The Consumer Discretionary portion of the SPX is down
-5.9%, while Consumer Staples have risen 0.65%. Although at the level of
global indexes it may appear to be a re-run of 2008 there is substantially
more resilience in portions of the US equity market than we saw 3 years
ago. - D-MXEF_Index.gif - spxgroup2011.gif

| | # 
# Thursday, 22 September 2011
Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:54:33 PM

The sudden collapse of EM currencies has come as a rude shock to many
participants and has produced conditions in FX markets unseen since the
crisis of 2008. One measure of this is the degree to which implied
volatility for EM FX options have surged in recent days. Attached is a
chart showing the JPM G7 Currency volatility index with that of the JPM EM
Currency Index. Note that the G7 index has moved sharply higher to 15.64
but remains at the level reached in May 2010 when Greece's credit issues
first burst on the scene (it easy to forget that the EUR traded at 1.19
against the USD in June 2010, down from 1.50 at the start of the year).
The EM index on the other hand is now at 18.33, a level unseen in the 10
year history of the index apart from in late 2008 - early 2009. Note also
that the EM index made its recovery low as late as July 8th 2011, when the
index reached 8.50. At that time EM implied volatility was 2.5 points less
than the US measure, also a post 2008 extreme. We suspect that the steady
downward move in EM currency volatility together with the appreciation of
currency values had encouraged a significant amount of short put trading as a
way to augment income. This in part explains the rapidity of the recent move
higher in vol (and lower for currencies). However, the size of the losses
means that redemption pressure has now been generated in the emerging
market bond complex, which for months has struck us as a dangerously
overcrowded portion of global asset markets and this has the potential to pile
on the misery. Although we doubt the extremes of 2008 will be revisited across
the board weaker currencies may come close to this level (indeed the TRY has
recorded an all time low today) we do expect losses to continue. In most cases
the levels recorded against the USD in the summer of 2011 are likely to be long
term peaks unseen again for a considerable period of time. -
D-JPMVXYG7_Index.gif -

| | # 
Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:06:46 PM

Despite the rapidly building stresses in the Euro-zone funding system there has
been no stated change of policy regarding the maintenance of the ECB balance
sheet. However, our tracking of the weekly data shows that there has been a
fairly notable increase in the size of the balance sheet since the introduction
of an expanded facility to purchase Italian and Spanish debt.

As can be seen on the attached chart the official ECB balance sheet grew
by 2.32% last week and is now at its largest level since June 2010. The
balance sheet excluding gold (which is revalued periodically but
fluctuations in gold's price has no influence on liquidity levels) grew to
€1,771 Bln, an increase of 13.28% over the last 13 weeks.

It is unclear whether this surge is simply a reflection of the delay that
it takes the ECB to drain the effect of debt purchases by holding repo
auctions with European banks (in which case the balance sheet will shrink
back over the next week or two) or if there has in fact been an unspoken
shift in ECB policy regarding the size of its balance sheet. The latter
would suggest that we are close to the ECB reaching its breaking point
over a resistance to Quantitative Easing, but it is too early to draw this
conclusion with any certainty. Even so the ECB's provision of liquidity is
easing at the margins, although at a pace which is unsufficient to reverse the
deterioration in Euro-zone funding markets. - W-.ECB-GOLD_Index.gif -

| | # 
Thursday, September 22, 2011 8:07:51 AM

This time last week the ECB announced a series of USD auctions aimed at
relieving an acute shortage of USD funding for Euro-zone institutions. This
caused a sharp reduction in stress measures and allowed a snap-back in European
asset markets to take place. We viewed this as a short window of opportunity
for more concrete steps to be introduced and unfortunately this period seems to
have ended without any progress being made. As the attached chart shows our
measures of Euro stress have moved back to where they were a week ago with
Italian 10 year yields (black) at 5.75%, the France Germany spread (pink) at
88.5 bp and the 3 month Euro swap (grey) -103 bp.

If the FRB's new policy of "Operation Twist" has been greeted by disappointment
by the market this is still far preferable to the continued ECB policy of
"Operation Twist in the Wind". Markets respond well to decisive leadership in
times of crisis and this remains sadly lacking on the far side of the Atlantic.
Meanwhile the spreading of dislocation into the emerging market complex greatly
raises the stakes for global investors, with the US asset markets and currency
increasingly looking like a safe haven. - eurostress92211.gif

| | # 
# Wednesday, 21 September 2011
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 2:47:20 PM

As most people had expected the FOMC elected to extend the maturity of its
Treasury holdings by shifting $400mm of short dated paper (3 years or less)
into treasuries with maturities of between 6 to 30 years. In addition they have
elected to use proceeds from maturing or redeemed MBS holdings to purchase
additional MBS securities rather than Treasuries (a policy originally enacted
in August 2010). One more the FOMC was split with three dissenting votes
opposing this additional policy. It also should not be ignored that the
language used by the FOMC to describe economic conditions was substantially
more bearish, which from our jaundiced viewpoint is a positive sign for the US
economy.

As we explained earlier today the effect of this move on underlying monetary
conditions is likely to be moderate since they were already about as loose as
can be accomplished prior to the statement. The major move post-announcement
has been in the ultra-long 30 year portion of the curve, which is the only
maturity to trade well above its 2008 low (3.04% compared to 2.51% in December
2008). Given that the 10 year to 30 year spread is still very wide at 118bp
(down 8 bp today) there is still some room for yield compression in this
portion of the curve. Nevertheless, as proved the case with QE2, we suspect that
the major portion of the move downwards has already taken place and the
treasury curve will now be vulnerable to any sense of renewed economic growth
in the US and/or a solution to Europe's funding issues.



more...
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Federal Open Market Committee Sept. 21 Statement: Full Text
2011-09-21 18:23:18.802 GMT


Sept. 21 (Bloomberg) -- The following is a reformatted
version of the full text of the statement released today by
the Federal Reserve in Washington:

Information received since the Federal Open Market
Committee met in August indicates that economic growth
remains slow. Recent indicators point to continuing
weakness in overall labor market conditions, and the
unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending has
been increasing at only a modest pace in recent months
despite some recovery in sales of motor vehicles as supply-
chain disruptions eased. Investment in nonresidential
structures is still weak, and the housing sector remains
depressed. However, business investment in equipment and
software continues to expand. Inflation appears to have
moderated since earlier in the year as prices of energy and
some commodities have declined from their peaks. Longer-
term inflation expectations have remained stable.
Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee
seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The
Committee continues to expect some pickup in the pace of
recovery over coming quarters but anticipates that the
unemployment rate will decline only gradually toward levels
that the committee judges to be consistent with its dual
mandate. Moreover, there are significant downside risks to
the economic outlook, including strains in global financial
markets. The Committee also anticipates that inflation will
settle, over coming quarters, at levels at or below those
consistent with the Committee’s dual mandate as the effects
of past energy and other commodity price increases
dissipate further. However, the Committee will continue to
pay close attention to the evolution of inflation and
inflation expectations.
To support a stronger economic recovery and to help
ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent
with the dual mandate, the Committee decided today to
extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities.
The Committee intends to purchase, by the end of June 2012,
$400 billion of Treasury securities with remaining
maturities of 6 years to 30 years and to sell an equal
amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of
3 years or less. This program should put downward pressure
on longer-term interest rates and help make broader
financial conditions more accommodative. The Committee will
regularly review the size and composition of its securities
holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as
appropriate.
To help support conditions in mortgage markets, the
Committee will now reinvest principal payments from its
holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed
securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. In
addition, the Committee will maintain its existing policy
of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction.
The Committee also decided to keep the target range
for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and
currently anticipates that economic conditions--including
low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for
inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant
exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at
least through mid-2013.
The Committee discussed the range of policy tools
available to promote a stronger economic recovery in a
context of price stability. It will continue to assess the
economic outlook in light of incoming information and is
prepared to employ its tools as appropriate.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben
S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman;
Elizabeth A. Duke; Charles L. Evans; Sarah Bloom Raskin;
Daniel K. Tarullo; and Janet L. Yellen. Voting against the
action were Richard W. Fisher, Narayana Kocherlakota, and
Charles I. Plosser, who did not support additional policy
accommodation at this time.



--Washington newsroom +1-202-624-1820. Editors: James
Tyson, Gail DeGeorge

collapse
| | # 
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:10:31 AM

As we await this afternoon's FRB statement and the possibility that some
additional policy easing is being considered, it is worth considering both
the state of current monetary conditions within the US and the actual
effect of QE2 on the US treasury market.

Looking at monetary conditions, these are currently extremely loose and
stimulative. One can argue about their effectiveness in stimulating actual
economic activity but there is little doubt about their level. At the
short end of the curve interest rates are at or below the 25bp FDTR all
the way out to 3 years (currently 28 bp), and are now anchored by the
promise made at the last FOMC meeting not to raise rates for an explicit
time frame. Clearly little additional change can occur even if the FRB was
to stop paying the tiny interest rate on excess reserves parked at the FRB
(although this would depress bank earnings in the meantime).

The longer end of the curve has been getting most of the attention, with
the possible decision to extend the average maturity of debt held. But
here again current yields are already extraordinarily stimulative. Perhaps more
importantly not only are rates low, but actual money supply growth has suddenly
started to accelerate with M2 growth now over 10% YoY.

One relationship worth considering is that between M2 annual growth and the 10
year treasury yield, since this shows the extent to which monetary growth
exceeds or lags the cost of longer term capital. With annual M2 growth close to
its 2008 peak (and exceeding this pace on a 13 week basis) and the 10 year
yield at an all time low, this spread has never been wider than it is today
(838 bp). Again having already achieved this remarkable combination of
ultra-low long term yields and rampant money supply growth it is hard to see
what more monetary policy can deliver. In fact we believe that the very
resilient performance by US equity and fixed income markets this summer are a
direct consequence of very loose monetary policy, in contrast with both
conditions and performance in most of the rest of the world.

The final point to remember is that even if the FOMC was to announce a
large scale intervention in the long end of the curve, it is unclear what
the ultimate response of the bond market would be. This time last year in
the run-up to QE2 the smart trade was to buy the middle of the US Treasury
curve ahead of the anticipated intervention by the FRB. The 5 year note
yield made its low on the day that QE2 was announced at 1.01% and went on
to back up all the way to 2.42% over the next 3 months as US macro data
and corporate earnings surprised to the upside (see chart). It was only towards
the end of QE2 that concerns over the US economy and then Europe led to the
massive flows back in to US Treasuries, with the low yield of 78 bp being
recorded almost 3 months after QE2 was completed.

Our opinion is that the US treasury yield is going to be far more influenced by
news out of Europe and emerging markets together with US macro data going
forwards than actual FRB activity. Today's statement may prove to be
influential for a few hours or a couple of sessions for global markets but US
monetary policy is not the main issue facing global investors today. Despite
the disappointment it would cause, we would be happy to see the FOMC keep to its
current track although we would not be surprised to see them bow to pressure
and be seen to be "doing something". - D-FARBTRSY_Index.gif -
D-M2%_YOY_Index.gif -

| | # 
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:21:51 AM

August US existing home sales came in somewhat above expectations as
5.03mm compared to 4.75mm consensus and 4.67mm in July. We do not consider
the positive deviance to be statistically significant and it still keeps
the existing home market mired at a level of activity equivalent to the
late 1990's. However, what this data does do is push back on the concept
of a double dip in the US housing market. In fact looking at the Single
Family home data what is surprising is how static the data has been over
the last 9 months with very little deviance in monthly reports since
November 2010. the 6 month ma (red) shows this and at 4.32mm is
indistinguishable from August's single month print of 4.47mm units. Perhaps
this steady pace of sales has something to do with supply as well as
demand, since we note that total inventory has stabilized around the 3mm
level. It may well be that the speed of processing foreclosure units is
starting to have an effect on the pace of existing home sales, accounting
for the steadiness seen on the chart.

In any case whatever the cause August's data is consistent with our belief
that the US housing market remains in the middle of a multi-year process
of working off the excess of the early 2000's. Clearly a faster pace of
sales would help, but this is not a requirement. Other than a benefit from
the swing in seasonal adjustment we do not expect to see much change
between now and the start of next spring, but at least a deterioration in
housing can be taken off the list of worry items for the weeks ahead. -
D-EHSLSL_Index.gif -

| | # 
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 9:08:45 AM

The silent meltdown of EM currencies continues apace with further sharp losses
being recorded over the last couple of sessions. We have updated our chart to
include the RUB (dark blue) which has fallen very sharply in recent days.

As can be seen the ZAR has now overtaken the TRY and is down 19.4% on a YTD
basis (but unlike the TRY nowhere close to its 2008 low). Perhaps the most
important line to follow though is the BRL (green) since Brazil was very much
the favored destination for fixed income flows during the first half of the
year. The BRL is now down over 9.3% for the year after appreciating strongly
during the first 6 months when investor flows were rampant. Since the start of
Q3, even allowing for the large positive carry on interest rates, the BRL is down
12.41% against the USD (see table attached), a loss that will come as a
complete surprise to many who rushed into this trade a few weeks ago. The sharp
losses in currencies have also depressed equity returns for USD investors. In
Brazil's case almost the entire recovery of a 19.1% rally in the IBOV from 47,793 to
56,945 has been extinguished by the currency depreciation. In USD terms the
index has bounced a mere 5.1% and is still down almost 25% for the year. -
emcurrenciesytd92111.gif - carryqtd.gif

| | # 
# Tuesday, 20 September 2011
Tuesday, September 20, 2011 8:12:18 AM

We have spent much of 2011 outlining the clear stresses in the Turkish economy
and are unsurprised to have witnessed a sharp correction in the local equity
market and the TRY come within touching distance of an all-time low against the
USD.

These are not normally the conditions that one would imagine lead to a debt
upgrade to investment grade from a major credit agency but we have become used
to some very "bold" decisions from S&P in recent weeks, who are dominating the
headlines this morning after downgrading Italy from A+ to A last night.

In the case of Turkey, today's decision is a classic example of taking a clear
existing trend and extrapolating it forwards despite the fact that the
underlying favorable conditions have significantly altered for the worse. The
announcement may create a brief window of respite (the XU100 index is up 4.4%
and the TRY 1.36% at the time of writing) but it will not change the
significant problems facing the administrators of this economy at the current
time. Nor will it make Turkey's markets immune to what appears to be a
significant divestment of emerging market exposure by global investors should
this gather pace in the coming sessions.



more...
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

X-S&P Raises LC Ratings On Turkey To 'BBB-/A-3'; Otk Pos
2011-09-20 11:57:50.978 GMT

LONDON (Standard & Poor's) Sept. 20, 2011--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services
today raised its local-currency sovereign ratings on the Republic of Turkey to
'BBB-/A-3' from 'BB+/B'. At the same time, Standard & Poor's affirmed its
national scale ratings on Turkey. We also affirmed the foreign-currency
sovereign ratings on Turkey at 'BB/B'.

Turkey's recovery rating remains at '3', and its transfer and convertibility
assessment (T&C) at 'BBB-'. The outlook on both the local- and
foreign-currency long-term sovereign ratings is positive.

The local-currency upgrade reflects our view of continuing improvements in
Turkey's financial sector and the deepening of local markets. In the capital
markets, the government yield curve now extends to 15 years, and the average
maturity of local currency government debt, which comprises three-quarters of
general government liabilities, has risen to 34 months in 2011 from 24 months
in 2008. Government debt is now predominately denominated in Turkish lira and
issued at fixed, nominal rates. In the foreign exchange markets, the Turkish
lira represented 0.7% of global turnover at end-2010, up from 0.2% in 2007,
according to the Bank for International Settlements. We also believe that the
Turkish banking system is adequately capitalized and we expect the state will
reduce its holdings of some public-sector commercial banks. The two-notch
differential between the foreign- and local-currency ratings also reflects
Standard & Poor's revised criteria for rating central governments (see
"Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and Assumptions," June 30, 2011).
Under these criteria, the central bank's track record of independent monetary
policy--with a free floating exchange rate regime--and the depth of the local
currency debt markets warrant a two-notch distinction.

Our positive outlook indicates that we see ratings upside. We believe that the
government will remain committed to stabilizing net general government
debt/GDP at around 35% by 2014, despite our expectations that GDP growth will
slow to just over 3% between 2012 and 2014 from its heady recent pace of 6%
(projected for 2011). We forecast that the general government's primary
surplus will slightly exceed 1% of GDP for 2011 before deteriorating mildly
over the ratings horizon due to an anticipated economic slowdown. Much of
2011's expected fiscal outperformance is due to temporary factors, including
the credit-driven expansion of nominal GDP by some 15%, as well as the
government's success in raising funds via a restructuring of past tax
liabilities. Restrained fiscal policy before the crisis means that general
government debt is relatively moderate, at 41% of GDP in 2010. While Turkey's
large and resilient economy benefits from favorable demographics, the social
security deficit continues to be the major driver of the headline general
government deficit.

We see Turkey's external position as the weakest element in its credit
profile. We expect Turkey's current account deficit will exceed 40% of current
account receipts (CARs) this year (equivalent to 10% of GDP) and we note that
net external debt of the financial sector has risen from 6% of CARs at
year-end 2008 to a forecast 42% at year-end 2011. While, at 13%, financial
sector external debt is still a relatively low percentage of GDP, Standard &
Poor's rating methodology focuses on an economy's foreign-currency-generating
capacity (that is, CARs) in the denominator as the key measure of
debt-servicing ability. We estimate that Turkey's gross external financing
needs (as a percentage of CARs plus usable reserves) will reach 145% in 2011,
one of the highest ratios for a rated sovereign. This heavy reliance on
external savings exposes Turkey to shocks, either domestic (for example if
Turkey's recent high domestic credit growth resulted in future bad loans) or
external (say, if rising risk aversion were to prompt foreign investors and
bank credit officers to reduce exposure to Turkish entities).

The outlook on the ratings is positive. We could raise the ratings on Turkey
if, once the economy cools as we expect, it can reduce its current account
deficits and slow its domestic credit growth without too badly affecting its
fiscal accounts or financial-sector stability. We could also raise the ratings
if deeper reforms to social security resulted in a stronger fiscal performance
that started to substantially reduce the government's debt.

The ratings could stabilize at current levels if an economic hard landing
reduced access to external funding or weakened the government's fiscal
accounts beyond our current expectations.

Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect on
the Global Credit Portal at www.globalcreditportal.com. All ratings affected
by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at
www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left
column. Alternatively, call one of the following Standard & Poor's numbers:
Client Support Europe (44) 20-7176-7176; London Press Office (44)
20-7176-3605; Paris (33) 1-4420-6708; Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-225; Stockholm
(46) 8-440-5914; or Moscow 7 (495) 783-4009.

Primary Credit Analyst: Frank Gill, London (44) 20-7176-7129;
[email protected]
Secondary Contact: Leila Butt, London (44) 20-7176-2138;
[email protected]
Additional Contact: Sovereign Ratings;
[email protected]


No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model,
software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof
(Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed
in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without
the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any
unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third-party
providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or
agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness,
timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for
any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained
from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data
input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES
DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR
USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S
FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY
SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable
to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory,
punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees,
or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits
and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even
if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are
statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of
fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make
any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content
following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied
on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user,
its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and
other business decisions. S&P's opinions and analyses do not address the
suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment
advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be
reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due
diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other
in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective
activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information
that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established
policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public
information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related
analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from
obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses.
S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites,
www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and
www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through
other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors.
Additional information about our ratings fees is available
at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and
may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned.
No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same
password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or
information other than as provided herein, contact Client Services,
55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to:
[email protected].

Copyright (c) 2011, Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC,
a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

This media release is 20 minutes delayed. CreditWire subscribers may access
real-time credit ratings and research by typing SPC <GO>.

In addition to CreditWire, Standard & Poor's also offers RatingsDirect,
the online source for real-time, objective credit ratings and research; and
RatingXpress, a real-time, customizable digital feed of credit information.

If you are interested in becoming a subscriber and would like more
information on Standard & Poor's real-time information products and services,
please call: HONG KONG (852) 2533-3500; LONDON (44) 20-7176-7176;
MELBOURNE (61) 3-9631-2000; NEW YORK (1) 212-438-7280;
PARIS (33) 1-4420-6758
Ratings are available in real-time at
http://www.standardandpoors.com

Provider ID: 00927027
-0- Sep/20/2011 11:57 GMT

collapse
| | # 
Tuesday, September 20, 2011 8:02:02 AM

We apologize if we sound like a broken record but the outperformance of the NDX
index, and the silence with which this has been greeted, is one of the more
mystifying aspects to the current marketplace. Perhaps this is because it is so
inconvenient to the dominant narrative which places a slowdown in the US
economy at the heart of the current problems, with the consumer anticipated to
be a key source of weakness. Meanwhile despite relentless outflows from US
equity mutual funds a number of large consumer sensitive technology and retail
companies have managed to record new highs in recent weeks, with AAPL becoming
the largest global corporation with a cushion of over $20bln to XOM.

However, it is important to realize that the outperformance of the index does
not derive from one stock alone (although after its recent gains AAPL is now
just over 15% of the NDX index). During yesterday's session for instance a
total of 8 stocks reached a new 52 week high, the largest number since July 8th
just prior to the run up to the 10 year high (see chart). That this should
occur at a time that most global indexes are bouncing off their 52 week lows,
and during a session in which many popular currencies lost 2 to 3% and a number
of commodity markets broke down, demonstrates that the NDX index has been the
most reluctant of participants in the wave of global "de-risking" that is still
ongoing. Indeed it would appear that the funds remaining in US equities are
starting to crowd into some of the more obvious names with clear signs that
they are being accumulated on weakness. This has created a "safety net" effect
during weaker sessions and caused the index to suffer significantly less damage
than all other major global markets, while participating fully during stronger
sessions in global markets. - ndxhilo92011.gif

| | # 
# Monday, 19 September 2011
Monday, September 19, 2011 9:59:36 AM

We have argued for several weeks that copper is the key commodity to
follow in order to get a sense of the "average" strength of the entire
complex, since its range-bound performance placed copper between very
strong gold and quite weak crude amongst the three major commodities. This
morning's breach of key support at $8,500 is therefore a significant move
that may suggest some liquidation is occurring across the complex at the
current time. Given the strong correlation of flows between emerging
markets and commodities it is not surprising that both should come under
sustained pressure, and that key support levels should give way in multiple
markets simultaneously. With less than two weeks left in the third quarter we
suspect that fund redemptions may have a large influence on the current market
weakness, with the need to sell to meet the month end deadline making for some
ugly downside moves. - D-LMCADS03_Comdty.gif -

| | # 
Monday, September 19, 2011 8:51:31 AM

With most eyes firmly fixed upon Europe it is worth noting that a sharp
deterioration in the performance of emerging market currencies in recent days.
This suggests that investor flows may finally be starting to reverse out of
both emerging market equity and fixed income markets, and threatens to make the
3rd quarter a very expensive one for investors who rushed into these popular
markets a few weeks ago.

Attached is a chart showing seven popular EM currencies all of which have been
rebased against the USD at 100 for their 12/31/10 values. As can be seen all 10
currencies are now down for the year with the losses ranging as high as 16% for
the TRY (purple), which today broke above the key 1.80 level and has led EM
weakness. Closely behind comes South Africa's ZAR (olive) now down 15.2% on the
year. This had been one of the strongest EM currencies over the last 24 months,
becoming significantly over-valued in the process. Perhaps most surprising is
the performance of the BRL (green) which is now down 5.6% for the year.
Although this is not yet a sizable loss YTD it comes in the face of massive
investor flows into local credit markets and magnifies the losses of the local
equity market (17.45% as of Friday) for foreign investors, while totally
extinguishing the positive carry from higher local interest rates.

Our sense is that this process has further to go and that the RBI's move to
defend the INR last week looks likely to be followed by a number of other
hurried currency interventions. It is important to understand that this would
change monetary conditions within emerging markets fairly sharply, since
interventions to prop up local currencies involve the selling off of reserves
and serve to deplete local money supply. Thus the positive twin forces of
investor flows and intervention to depress local currencies that did so much to
boost emerging market performance (both in terms of actual activity and market
performance) have suddenly reversed in recent weeks, with some troubling
implications for investors still heavily exposed to this asset class. -
emcurrencies9192011.gif

| | # 
# Friday, 16 September 2011
Friday, September 16, 2011 10:28:22 AM

September's University of Michigan poll came in at 57.8 just above consensus of
57, but this does not change the fact that this is a remarkably low number
given current economic conditions. At 2.8 points higher than last month's
multi-decade low this reading remains in a territory only previously recorded
during the deep recessions of 2008/9 and 1980. The same can be said about the 6
month rate of deterioration which hit -21.80 in August and bounced to -9.70 in
September. These sorts of readings have previously only been seen as a reaction
to a sharp deterioration in economic conditions and not during a period in
which the economy's direction hangs in the balance. The polled population has
clearly become much more cautious about future risk in recent years, which is
understandable, but does not change the future outcome.

Fortunately there is little historic evidence that consumer sentiment affects
actual retail activity in a straightforward manner. Where it does tend to
matter is in investment flows since this data tends to follow substantial moves
in equity markets. Again this collapse is an exaggerated response to losses in
the overall US equity market, but perhaps this is because retail activity has
been concentrated in "cheap" financial stocks and non-US equities both of which
have fared far worse than the overall equity market (the SPX is down -3.26% YTD
at the time of writing). - univodmichigansep11.gif

| | # 
Friday, September 16, 2011 9:14:32 AM

In recent weeks, the vast majority of emerging market central banks have
either placed policy hikes on hold (Chile was the latest example yesterday
afternoon) or actually reversed course and started implementing cuts
(Brazil and Turkey). The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) chose to break ranks
last night and raise the 3 month REPO cut off yield by 25bp to 8.25%. This
brings the cumulative rate rise since March 2010 up to 3.50% and the rise
over the last 12 months back up to 2.25%. The rate cut may not have been a
surprise (the majority of forecasters had anticipated it) but this does
not make it any less constrictive for an Indian financial system that is
already showing clear signs of stress.

However, as can be seen on the attached chart, the RBI has previously ignored
signs of weakness in the local asset market and in fact chose to push rates
sharply higher in 2008 despite an already weak local equity market. It was not
until after the collapse of the SENSEX by approximately 50% from its January
2008 high that the RBI made its first rate cut in October 2008 and there is no
reason to suspect that this institution has become more market friendly over
the last 3 years.

One issue further complicating policy is the sudden weakness of the Rupee
(INR). The INR spot rate moved sharply higher this week prompting direct
intervention by the RBI once it crossed the 48 level. In response to the
intervention and increase in rates, the INR has moved back to 47.26 this
morning, but this still leaves it under significant pressure. The weaker
currency is a double negative since it encourages higher local rates by
the RBI while increasing the risk of losses for foreign investors who remain.
As we have explained before, the INR and a host of other key EM currencies were
boosted by powerful investor flows into both fixed income and equities
over the last 30 months. This process has ceased in recent weeks and even
started to reverse at the margins turning a positive force into a headwind
right at the point that local asset markets and economies could use some
extra help. India remains one of the clearest example of this phenomenon
and we continue to regard it with extreme caution. - W-SENSEX_Index.gif -
W-INR_Curncy.gif -

| | # 
Friday, September 16, 2011 8:34:58 AM

The market has now had 24 hours to absorb the implication of yesterday's news
regarding the ECB's attempt to stabilize access to USD liquidity within the
Eurozone and its response has been a positive but hardly overwhelming
endorsement of this new policy.

In order to track this in real time we have added the 3 month Euro swap premium
(grey line lower chart) to our existing chart showing key Euro sovereign
yields. Conveniently its range is very close to that of the France/Germany 10
year spread and given that it is large French banks that have been the main
victims of the USD drought (caused by a refusal of US money market funds to
roll over large commercial paper positions) there is more than a numerical
coincidence between these two measures.

As can be seen this key funding rate improved sharply yesterday from -98 to -77
bp, before closing at -81bp. Today has seen a slight slippage down to -85bp
which still indicates a high degree of funding stress but at least not a USD
shortage that is feeding upon itself (which was the case prior to yesterday).
Note that the first USD auction will not take place for approximately 3 weeks
leaving the market to fend for itself in the interim.

The sovereign credit market shows a similar moderate improvement. The Italian
10 year yield (black) has moved down to 5.45% and the Spanish yield (red)
nudged lower to 5.30%, while the France/Germany spread (pink lower) has crept
up to -74 bp. Our sense is that this week's move has done no more than buy some
time for further steps to be taken. This in itself is an achievement for there
was a growing risk of an imminent rapid drain of liquidity from one or more
major European institutions. This has moderated over the last 48 hours but the
market will have limited patience with the authorities if further changes to
policy are not forthcoming. - eurostress91611.gif

| | # 
# Thursday, 15 September 2011
Thursday, September 15, 2011 11:50:22 AM

Last month's Philly Fed data proved to be a very poor report that decisively
broke confidence amongst many market participants even though its weakness was
not really reflected in the more important national ISM data that was released
2 weeks later.

September's Philly Fed report shows some improvement (suggesting that August's
data was an abberation) but still remains in negative territory at -17.5,
slightly worse than consensus estimates of 15.0 (black line). The key New Order
metric rose to -11.30 but stays in negative territory which is the worst news
contained in the report. Inventories (blue) show a fairly fast rebuild at 10.20
and Employment (green) turned slightly positive at 5.80. Somewhat confusingly
shipments (not shown) fell quite dramatically to -22.8, which is hard to
reconcile with other data.

Interestingly this month's survey contained a special question regarding actual
activity over the 3rd quarter:

"How will your firm’s total production for the third quarter compare with that
of the second quarter?

Lower 41.1
No Change 17.8
Higher 41.1
Average increase: 0.3%*

Again this does not really tally with the sense the overall data has given of a
sharp slowdown in regional activity. A further question regarding the 4th
quarter did come out on the negative side on balance but not to the degree that
may have been expected:

"For the upcoming fourth quarter, what growth do you expect for production at
your plant compared with third quarter?"

% subtotals
Significant deceleration 8.1
Some deceleration 21.6
Slight deceleration 18.9 48.7

No change 10.8 10.8

Slight acceleration 16.2
Some acceleration 17.6
Significant acceleration 4.1 37.8
NR 2.7 2.7

Total 100.0 100.0

As with so much of the recent US data we would describe today's Philly Fed
report as disappointing without offering decisive evidence of the degree of
slowdown that is rapidly becoming baked into consensus belief. -
phillyfedsep2011.gif

| | # 
Thursday, September 15, 2011 11:04:15 AM

Earlier this morning the ECB announced the first major change to its
liquidity management since the acute funding pressures within the
Euro-zone became apparent. This involves the creation of 3 separate
auctions of 90 day USD paper to be held on October 12th, November 9th and
December 7th and is designed to address the particular shortage of USD
liquidity that we highlighted yesterday on the chart showing the 3 month
Euro swap rate. Although we do not believe that this represents the sort
of decisive shift in policy that would place a line under this traumatic
episode, it is an important shift in both rhetoric and policy that
indicates that the ECB and other central banks are at least watching the
deterioration of liquidity and starting to design specific policies to
address it. The initial response of the funding market has been impressive
with the swap rate improving to by 18 bp to -80.25 (see chart), although this
still represents a very abnormal level for this metric.

We would also note that the FRB has been pulled into this new action,
echoing its key role in the collapse of Euro-liquidity 3 years ago. In the
weeks after the crisis the FRB injected a total of $650 bln into global
central banks, a large portion of which went to the ECB (with substantial
funds also being sent to a number of key emerging markets).

This can be tracked on the weekly report of the FRB's balance sheet that comes
out each Thursday afternoon (FARBCBLS index for Bloomberg (c) users).
Interestingly having been at zero for many months this facility briefly spiked
to $200 mln on August 17th and $500mln on August 24th before falling back to
zero one week later (we had not noticed this activity prior to today). Although
these sums are trivial, the sudden reactivation of this facility prior to
today's announcement is surprising and is possibly a sign that the FRB wished
to test the operation of this facility in case it needed to be reactivated
(note this is pure conjecture on our part).

We have speculated before that the FRB could ultimately be pulled into a
coordinated rescue of the Eurozone debt market and today's announcement takes
the FRB one small step further towards a fuller involvement (although we would
still describe this as an "outlier event").

Meanwhile the reaction of other European asset markets to today's news is
instructive. Equity markets have rallied hard, aided by the fact that this
announcement was made on the eve of tomorrow's option expiration which causes
the maximum disruption to those holding large put positions (this is an old
trick of central banks, initially used by Alan Greenspan at the height of the
LTCM crisis in October 1998). Whether these gains can be sustained into next
week is therefore questionable in the absence of improvement in other key
markets such as sovereign credit. This has been largely unmoved by
today's announcement, with yields remaining highly extended for Italian
(5.58%) and Spanish (5.40%) 10 year paper while the France/Germany spread
has ticked higher to -78bp (see chart). This indicates that at best, today's
news represents the "beginning of the end" for this episode. While the change
in rhetoric and stance by the ECB and other central banks is helpful, it
does not constitute the sort of resolution to this long and troubling
episode that in our opinion is still required. - D-EUBSC_Curncy.gif -
euroyileds91511.gif

| | # 
Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:04:19 AM

Another poor Initial Claims report has dampened the enthusiasm that had
built after the recent recovery in the US equity market. This week's
headline report rose to 428K from last week's 417K (revised higher from
414K). This is somewhat higher than the consensus reading of 411K and
takes the 4 week ma back up to 419K, roughly where it was in late July
prior to the sharp improvement in August's data. However, this week's
report covers the Labor Day holiday which means that the headline report
is calculated off 4 days of claims with the number then adjusted by an
assumption of how many additional claimants would have turned up on the absent
Monday. This together with other seasonal factors means that this week marks
the widest negative deviance between Non-Seasonally Adjusted and Seasonally
Adjusted claims in the annual calendar (see chart) making it significantly less
reliable than a normal week.

What we would say is that recent reports make the next 3 or 4 week's reports
somewhat more important than usual since they should indicate whether or not
recent data is an early signal that employment has started to deteriorate
within the US economy or simply one of the regular deviances from trend during
an economic cycle. - D-.INITSEAS_Index.gif - D-INJCJC4_Index.gif

| | # 
# Wednesday, 14 September 2011
Wednesday, September 14, 2011 2:43:22 PM

We continue to be impressed at the robust performance of the NDX index,
which has resisted the temptation to collapse on a number of weak global
sessions and taken advantage of the periods of respite to regain ground lost
last month.

Today is an example of the latter and the gain of 36.4 points (1.66%) has
taken the index just above its falling 50 day ma for the first time since
the abrupt collapse at the start of August. The index is also back in
positive territory for 2011 making it unique amongst major global indexes.
The index still has plenty of resistance with the early September high (2268)
and the flat 200 day ma (2288)in its immediate path and would not be immune
to any further shock-waves emanating from Europe. Nevertheless it has
established itself as something of a safe haven in recent weeks despite is
makeup of economically sensitive equities and we expect it to hold up
relatively well for the duration of the corrective phase as well as lead
any recovery that follows. - D-NDX_Index.gif -

| | # 
Wednesday, September 14, 2011 9:31:58 AM

As rumors swirl regarding the stability of large European institutions it is
worth remembering that today marks the third anniversary of the day authorities
failed to find a workable solution for Lehman Brothers, sparking off the crisis
that led to gridlock in global funding markets and wholesale liquidation of
financial assets.

With this in mind we have attached two charts that compare the build up of
financial stress in the US and European funding markets in recent weeks to that
in the run up to Lehman's failure. For the US we are using the LIBOR/OIS
spread, which became the focus of rabid attention back in 2008 and for Europe
the 3 month Euro-swap rate.

In terms of the US, although there has clearly been a deterioration of most
measures of credit and funding markets to well below "normal" levels, these
remain well within acceptable limits for a deep corrective phase. They are
indicative of limited liquidation of financial assets and a pull back from
funding commitments but not the free-fall that was already in evidence in the
weeks leading to Lehman's failure. The LIBOR/OIS spread is typical in this
regard, widening to an abnormal 27 bp but well below the 85 bp reached on the
Friday prior to the "Lehman weekend". This measure was to soar to 350bp by
early October prior to the FRB's massive intervention in credit markets.

In Europe on the other hand measures of financial stress indicate that a much
higher risk of a "credit event" currently exists. The 3 month Euro swap
rate measures the premium that lenders will pay to access USD funding. In
normal markets this has ranged from 0 to -30 but in recent days has collapsed
as low as -112 (note that the opposite was true in 2008 when this rate was
still at a normal -14 on the even of Lehman's collapse). This highly abnormal
rate indicates a breakdown of the market mechanism within this important
funding market and suggests that Europe is experiencing levels of stress which
have historically preceded financial failure. Although funding markets can
dislocate and then repair themselves very rapidly it normally requires an event
to bring "closure" (no pun intended) to an episode that has reached the current
level of stress.

This does not guarantee that this will occur. There is still time for a much
needed shift in monetary policy and/or direct injections of capital into the
European banking system. But waiting for the results of well meaning conference
calls which are not followed up by concrete action or scanning the Chinese
Internet for evidence that large scale bond purchases may be forthcoming,
remind us of the tension that mounted as the limousines drove up to the NY
Federal Reserve on that sunny Sunday morning three years ago. -
euroswaprate20082011.gif - liborois.gif

| | # 
Wednesday, September 14, 2011 8:24:24 AM

India becomes the first significant emerging market to intervene to defend its
currency from depreciating against the USD. Note that despite the comments in
the story capital withdrawal is still quite moderate, but simply removing the
powerful inflows into Indian financial assets (over $30bln into equities alone
in 2011) has uncovered the latent currency weakness in a deficit economy.
Although an intervention such as this may work in the short term any sustained
speculative run on the currency is likely to force the rate well above the 48
level that has been chosen as the "line in the sand".



more...
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Rupee Pares Loss From 2-Year Low on Intervention Speculation
2011-09-14 12:19:13.471 GMT


By Jeanette Rodrigues
Sept. 14 (Bloomberg) -- India’s rupee pared losses,
rebounding from a two-year low, on speculation the central bank
sold dollars to curb exchange-rate volatility.
The Reserve Bank of India intervened after the rupee fell
below 48 a dollar for the first time since September 2009, a
trader at a state-owned bank said, declining to be identified as
he is not authorized to speak to the media. The rupee lost 6.5
percent this quarter, the most among Asia’s 10 most-traded
currencies, on concern global investors will sell emerging-
market assets as Europe’s debt crisis worsens.
“It looks like the RBI is in the market because we have
seen some nationalized banks offering dollars since the rupee
crossed 48,” said Vikas Babu, a currency trader in Mumbai at
Andhra Bank. “Since then, speculative bidding has reduced and
importers will wait for the rupee to settle before reentering
the market” to buy dollars.
The rupee declined 0.1 percent to 47.6575 per dollar at the
5 p.m. close in Mumbai, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
It touched 48.01 earlier, the lowest level since Sept. 29, 2009,
and is headed for the worst quarter since the collapse of Lehman
Brothers Holdings Inc. in 2008.
The central bank stepped into the currency market after the
rupee fell past 48, said J. Moses Harding, an executive vice
president at IndusInd Bank Ltd. The RBI “doesn’t comment on the
day-to-day movement” of the rupee, said Alpana Killawala, a
spokeswoman for the monetary authority.

Volatility Surges

The Indian currency fell for an eighth day, the longest
losing streak in a month, after the Asian Development Bank cut
its forecast for India’s economic growth in the year ending
March 31 to 7.9 percent from 8.2 percent estimated in April. The
nation’s inflation accelerated to 9.78 percent in August, the
fastest pace in more than a year, a government report showed
today.
Implied volatility on one-month, dollar-rupee options
jumped to an 11-month high of 10.8 percent today from 9.75
percent yesterday, data compiled by Bloomberg show. The gauge of
expected swings in exchange rates, quoted by traders as part of
option prices, is still below the 10.88 percent average of the
past three years.
Overseas funds sold $166 million more Indian shares than
they bought last week, after net sales of $2.4 billion in
August, the most since October 2008, according to exchange data.
Greece’s budget deficit widened 22 percent in the first eight
months of the year, fanning speculation the country will fail to
meet conditions for further bailout funds.

‘Under Pressure’

“Unless there is a change in global sentiment, the rupee
will stay under pressure,” Mumbai-based Harding said.
The currency could drop to 49 per dollar in “the medium
term,” Sarvendra Srivastava, a technical strategist at Emkay
Global Financial Services Ltd. in Mumbai., wrote in a research
note today.
“We expect the rupee to stay weak as asset selloffs fail
to fund India’s current-account deficit,” analysts at BNP
Paribas SA, including London-based Paul Mortimer-Lee, wrote in a
research report published today. The shortfall was $5.4 billion
in the three months ended March 31, according to the latest
central bank data.
Offshore forwards indicate the rupee will trade at 48.27 in
three months, compared with expectations of 48.17 yesterday.
Forwards are agreements to buy or sell assets at a set price and
date. Non-deliverable contracts are settled in dollars.

For Related News and Information:
Stories on Indian currency research: TNI INB ANAFX BN <GO>
Most read Indian currency and bonds stories: MNI INB BN <GO>
For Indian rupee forecasts: FXFC INR <GO>

--Editors: Abhay Singh, Anil Varma

To contact the reporter on this story:
Jeanette Rodrigues in Mumbai at +91-22-6120-3734 or
[email protected]

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Sandy Hendry at +852-2977-6608 or
[email protected]

collapse
| | # 
# Tuesday, 13 September 2011
Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:44:56 AM

On the basis that it is more important to watch what a central bank does
rather than what it says it is doing we have started to monitor the ECB's
balance sheet quite closely. Weekly data is published on Tuesday morning
(US time) and breaks down the balance sheet into a myriad of categories.
One of these is the ECB's gold holdings, which are re-valued once a
quarter. Thus when interpreting the level of liquidity supported by the
ECB's actions it is necessary to back out the effect of gold price changes
since these really have nothing to do with the availability of credit in
the Eurozone system (the FRB in contrast holds its gold at a fixed value
well below the current market price).

The attached chart therefore shows the total ECB balance sheet ex gold holdings
(which currently total €363 bln) and this reveals that the ECB was even tighter
in early 2011 than the total balance sheet suggests. While the latter rises
steadily (if slowly) from late 2009 the balance sheet ex-gold shrank by
approximately €300 bln (16%) from June 2010 to April 2011, taking the balance
sheet's size back to approximately €1,550 bln where it was in late September
2008.

Recent action has ameliorated things to a degree and the balance sheet (ex
gold) has risen back to €1,723 bln, with the bulk of the increase taking
place at the introduction of the new expanded bond purchase program. This
week's data showed a further increase of €13bln (0.77%). This suggests
that the ECB has either chosen or has been unable to entirely sterilize
its bond purchases, but is not a sufficient pace of increase to suggest a
stealthy change of policy. Even after this recent increase monetary
conditions in the Eurozone remain inappropriately tight, reminding us of
the FRB's mistaken policy during the 6 months between the fall of Bear
Stearns and Lehman in 2008. - W-.ECB-GOLD_Index.gif -

| | # 
# Monday, 12 September 2011
Monday, September 12, 2011 2:36:51 PM

We have been patiently monitoring silver since it made a climactic surge to
just under $50 since this move struck us as a textbook case of speculative
excess causing an important long term top to be put in place. Since that time
silver, unlike gold, has been unable to benefit from the deterioration in
financial stability and growing pressure on global central banks to move
towards looser (or in the case of the FRB even looser) monetary policy. Thus
while gold was able to surge from roughly $1,500 to a new all time high of
$1,900 at the start of July, silver's strong performance in percentage terms
(gaining roughly 26% from $34.70 to $43.70) only represented a partial
retracement of the steep decline suffered in May.

Thus far September has not been a kind month for silver, despite the continued
ructions in Europe. Losses of 4.12% last week have been followed by a further
loss of 4.07% today taking the metal just below the 50 day ma at the time of
writing. We would not yet consider this support to have been decisively broken
but it is certainly under pressure, and a breach would sent the metal down to
test what should be strong support in a band between the 200 day ma ($35.85)
and the May low ($32.12). Interestingly, a comparison of silver's 2011
performance to that of the NDX index in 2000 still holds up nicely and this
guide suggests that silver could be expected to decline to around $35 around
the current time,then enjoy one last bounce of support before commencing a much
more serious (terminal) decline a few weeks later (see chart).

Since we are dealing with two very different asset classes separated by a
decade in time there is no guarantee that history will repeat itself in this
manner. On the other hand there are reasons to pay heed to history's guide, not
least of which the inability, thus far, of silver to take advantage of what
theoretically are ideal circumstances to advance. - D-SILV_Comdty.gif -
silverndx2000.gif

| | # 
Monday, September 12, 2011 9:11:42 AM

Over the weekend China issued its monthly monetary statistics which
continue to show a steady tightening of conditions within the economy.
Total M2 grew by 1.01% in August but since this was a significantly lower
growth rate than August 2010 the annual rate of change slowed to 13.56%,
the lowest pace since 2001. The more volatile 3 month RoC ticked higher to
2.27% but this still projects an annual growth of less than 10% going
forwards.

Interestingly this reduction in M2 growth is occurring against a backdrop
of steady loan issuance which has been close to 600 bln CNY for the last
18 months. August New Loans totaled 548.5 bln CNY, which were a little
higher than consensus estimates of 500 bln. Back in August 2010 loan
growth of virtually the same scale (600.92 bln CNY) translated into annual M2
growth of 19.21%. This shows the effect of accelerating asset prices and
the total volume of assets available for purchase (primarily housing
related), causing the same amount of nominal lending to result in quite
different monetary growth.

At 13.5% M2 is now at or below the reported growth rate of Industrial
Production (13.5%), Retail Sales (16.9%), Urban Fixed Assets (25%) and Imports
(30.7%). We may not yet have reached the point at which monetary policy has
disrupted economic activity (although as we explained on Friday we doubt that
the official data will make this apparent in real time) but we are certainly
headed in that direction. The prevailing view of either no slowdown or a
moderate "soft landing" still strikes us as somewhat optimistic. -
D-CNMSM2_Index.gif -

| | # 
# Friday, 09 September 2011
Friday, September 9, 2011 10:28:39 AM

The attached short statement from the ECB this morning shows that strains over
the Euro-sovereign crisis are reaching their breaking point in both asset
markets and board-rooms. Nowhere have these ructions been more painful than
within Germany, which is in the unfortunate position of playing unwilling "ant"
to the surrounding "grasshopper" nations. We have commented extensively in
recent weeks on the performance of the DAX and it is unsurprising that it is
Germany's prominent ECB member Juergen Stark which has chosen to resign in
protest as to whatever "solution" is being proposed within that body.

In terms of the market reaction we note that the Euro is finally starting to
come under pressure and that it fell sharply in response to this announcement.
We had been quite surprised at the resilience of the key €/$ cross in recent
months but key support at 1.40 seems to have finally been broken and the
process of "catching up with reality" is typically fairly brutal. There is no
obvious support before 1.35 and even that level may prove to be a resting place
before this currency resumes a deeper decline.

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

ECB: 9 September 2011 - Jürgen Stark resigns from his position
2011-09-09 13:45:40.211 GMT

http://www.ecb.int/press/pr/date/2011/html/pr110909.en.html

PageExcerpt:
Today, Jürgen Stark, Member of the Executive Board and Governing Council of the
European Central Bank (ECB), informed President Jean-Claude Trichet that, for
personal reasons, he will resign from his position prior to the end of his term
of office ... - eurusd9911.gif

| | # 
Friday, September 9, 2011 9:35:10 AM

In general we caution that most economic statistics are simply too
volatile to be followed on a month to month basis, and that they should be
used as a guide for general trend (which they are fairly good at
monitoring) or direction rather than as an indication as to where exactly the
economy is at any point in time.

In China's case the problem with the data over the last couple of years is that
it is simply not volatile enough. Even if we were deluded enough to believe
that China's "command economy" results in a superior control over the the
outcome of economic policy we would still be left trying to understand how
China's statisticians are so much better at measuring this activity than every
other major economy. Absent in China's data are the large monthly swings either
side of a mean that can amount to several percentage points in faster growing
economies (see for instance Brazil, India and Turkey in comparison). Instead
the three major measures of activity (Retail Sales, Urban Fixed Assets &
Industrial Production) have remained remarkably static, despite a historic
tendency to fluctuate fairly wildly prior to 2009 (see attached chart).

August's data followed the familiar pattern with Industrial Production
(13.5% vs. 13.7% consensus), Retail Sales (17% vs. 17%) and Fixed Assets
Investment (25% vs. 25.2%) all being reported in line with expectations.
This is even after a fairly radical change in monetary conditions over
recent months, which in theory should have seen somewhat more of an
acceleration 12-18 months ago and a deceleration in recent months. Our
growing belief is that China's official economic data should not be relied
upon to make any substantial investment decision and that the few private
sources of data (such as sales reported by public companies) will prove to
be a much better guide to any change in conditions. Note this does not
mean that China is already decelerating, simply that one cannot conclude
that all is well by taking official data at face value. - D-CNRSACMY_Index.gif
-

| | # 
# Thursday, 08 September 2011
Thursday, September 8, 2011 10:07:37 AM

A very good summary of what to expect tonight from the President. Needless to
say we do not see this speech as marking a turning point in the correction. If
anything it risks reminding the market of the woeful shortcomings of leadership
on both sides of Washington's aisle.



more...
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

A Layman’s Guide to the President’s Jobs Speech: Caroline Baum
2011-09-08 00:00:08.0 GMT


By Caroline Baum
Sept. 8 (Bloomberg) -- Let’s face it: If the president had
a plan to create jobs, he wouldn’t have kept it under wraps
until now. Why take flak from Republicans and heat from the
public if you have what it takes to turn the economy and labor
market around?
Barack Obama doesn’t have a plan to create jobs. Nor is
that his job. The government’s role is to provide an environment
in which the private sector will create them. That should be his
goal.
For weeks, the White House has been hyping the president’s
speech to a joint session of Congress. I suspect it will be full
of pomp and circumstance signifying nothing (with apologies to
Will Shakespeare). Obama will offer some warmed-over
“stimulus,” including aid to the states, extended unemployment
benefits, temporary tax breaks and infrastructure spending;
mortgage relief for homeowners; and perhaps regulatory relief
for business. The price tag, according to those briefed on the
speech: $300 billion.
For those of you who don’t follow the Washington play-by-
play, here are some things to watch for this evening to help you
determine whether the president is offering more of the same or
has discovered an elixir for job growth.

1. A temporary solution, a permanently bad idea
The president is expected to ask Congress to extend the
payroll tax holiday for employees beyond Jan. 1 and include
employers in the game. Other temporary incentives to encourage
hiring are also on the table.
Why would any company respond to a one-time tax credit for
adding employees when it has to assume a long-term expense --
salary and benefits -- in the process? Answer: It wouldn’t,
unless that company were planning to hire anyway.
Sure, if there’s an incentive with no cost attached people
will jump on it. Take a look at a graph of auto sales and home
sales to see how consumers responded when Cash for Clunkers and
the homebuyers’ tax credit were introduced in 2009.
The two programs pulled demand forward. It collapsed when
the programs ended. Both new and existing home sales plumbed new
depths after the credit expired.
If Obama’s jobs speech is filled with more temporary
measures, you can hit the mute button and take a quick nap
before the NFL kickoff.

2. The ghost of George W. Bush
We know it’s Bush’s fault: the housing bubble, the bust,
the financial crisis, the recession, the anemic recovery, the
trillion-dollar annual deficits, everything. Almost three years
into his first term, Obama needs to move on. Unless he accepts
responsibility for something, anything, you’ll know that this is
just another campaign speech.
The same goes for his chronic finger-pointing at the
Republican Party. The Obama-appointed National Commission on
Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (aka the Simpson-Bowles
Commission) issued a full report in December 2010 with
recommendations to reduce the deficit, stabilize the debt and
put Social Security on sound footing. The commission proposed
spending cuts and real tax reform that would raise revenue by
eliminating loopholes and tax breaks: the kind of “balanced”
approach Obama now touts.
When the report came out, the president thanked the
commission for its effort and filed it in the bottom drawer. If
he had any thoughts about a grand bargain on deficit reduction,
he kept them to himself until the debt-ceiling debate last
month.
If Obama starts pointing fingers this evening, you’ll know
he’s going for theatrics. For my money, there’s greater
entertainment value in listening to John McEnroe and Mary
Carillo chat it up at the U.S. Open tennis tournament.

3. No entitlements, no beef
The White House, in an attempt to lower expectations for
tonight’s address after fanning them for three weeks, said Obama
would unveil a separate deficit-reduction plan sometime after
the jobs speech. No doubt the president wants to avoid being
seen as an advocate for spending money to save money.
The problem is, the U.S. keeps spending and spending while
the saving is elusive. At some point -- and we are fast
approaching it -- repeated short-run attempts to alleviate
unemployment will result in bigger long-run problems and higher
unemployment via the ballooning debt.
The president has to demonstrate this evening that he’s
serious about deficit reduction, even if he plays hide-and-seek
with his plan. If he advocates short-term fixes and avoids
mentioning the need to reform programs like Medicare and Social
Security before they go broke, pour yourself a glass of wine.
Maybe you won’t remember what he said in the morning.

4. Banking on infrastructure
No one would deny that the nation’s roads, bridges, transit
systems and schools are in bad shape. The American Society of
Civil Engineers gave the U.S. a “D” on its 2009 infrastructure
report card and estimated that it would take a $2.2 trillion
investment over five years to address the state of disrepair.
The concept of an infrastructure bank has been kicking
around for a while. It’s an idea whose time has come, is long
overdue or is another one of those public-private partnerships
that sounds better on paper than in practice.
The problem with infrastructure spending isn’t the policy.
It’s the politics and red tape. When asked about the lackluster
results of the $830 billion stimulus enacted in 2009, Obama was
forced to admit that “shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as
we expected.”
Before you bank on public-works projects absorbing all
those unemployed construction workers ahead of the 2012
election, pay attention to what the president says about the
permitting process and execution. The devil is always in the
details.

5. Class warfare
Although economic growth is a prerequisite for employment,
jobs start with employers. It’s axiomatic that if you want
businesses to hire, you can’t vilify them.
The same goes for entrepreneurs, those “millionaires and
billionaires” Obama loves to dis. It turns out that business
startups are the sole source of job creation in the U.S.,
according to a 2010 study by the Kauffman Foundation in Kansas
City, Mo., based on the Census Bureau’s Business Dynamics
Statistics.
Obama has yet to grasp this concept. If he continues to
portray business as an enemy of the people, he’ll be a hero to
the labor unions. But they aren’t about to vote Republican
anyway.
Last week, the federal government sued 17 big banks for
mortgage fraud: Many of the same banks it rescued with the
Troubled Asset Relief Program in 2008. Actions speak louder than
words.

Obama isn’t the only one touting an economic plan this
week. On Tuesday, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney
unveiled his 59 points in a 160-page book. The other candidates
are sure to follow.
I confess I’m a less-is-more kind of gal. I’d settle for
one big idea, as long as it’s a good one.

(Caroline Baum, author of “Just What I Said,” is a
Bloomberg View columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.)

For Related News and Information:
More Baum columns: NI BAUM <GO>
More Bloomberg View: VIEW <GO>
Latest White House News: NI EXE <GO>

--Editors: Mary Duenwald, Stacey Shick

Click on “Send Comment” in sidebar display to send a letter to
the editor.

To contact the writer of this column:
Caroline Baum in New York at +1-212-617-3369 or
[email protected].

To contact the editor responsible for this column:
Mary Duenwald +1-212-205-0366 or [email protected]

collapse
| | # 
Thursday, September 8, 2011 8:51:51 AM

US Initial Claims remained slightly higher than expectations of 405K
coming in at 414K. Last week's claims were revised 3K higher to 412K but
deviances of this magnitude are well within the error tolerance of this
series. This data takes the 4 week ma up to 414K, where it was in mid-July
prior to August's improvement but still well below the level seen in early
May. Claims therefore remain somewhat better than the non-farm payroll
data released for August and show not significant deterioration in
employment over the last 6 months (but no improvement either). There were
no special factors in today's data but it does mark the last report before
the Labor Day holiday and the consequent change in seasonal adjustment. -
D-INJCJC4_Index.gif -

| | # 
# Wednesday, 07 September 2011
Wednesday, September 7, 2011 10:40:28 AM

Given that the SPX index stopped making straightforward positive progress
in mid February (shortly after doubling its March 2009 trough value) it is
interesting that it is only in the last couple of weeks that strategists
have started to change their 2011 year end targets. Bloomberg helpfully
keep track of the consensus in a single index (although it should be noted
that this is based on the larger Wall Street houses rather than a totality
of the entire range of opinion).

As can be seen on the attached chart, the normal practice has been to issue a
bullish year end target in January (hence the staircase like effect on the
chart) and then wait for the market to catch up. On 5 occasions since the data
starts in 1999 the market has beaten the consensus (2009 marking the peak
outperformance), with the other years seeing some significant misses.
Unsurprisingly strategists tend to be reactive rather than predictive. There is
no example of the mass of opinion predicting a sustained transition from bull
to bear markets or vice versa. No doubt individual strategists have had their
successes, but these are balanced by the simultaneous failures of their
peers.

The current situation is intriguing since the last few weeks of August saw
a fairly sizeable cut in the year end consensus from just over 1400 to
1359, the latter being the lowest consensus target for 2011. Note that no
update to this index has been issued since the release of last week's
employment number which caused much hand wringing, and we suspect that a
further trimming of estimates will take place in the near term. Even so
the SPX index still lies approximately -175 points below the year end
target and was -233 points below in mid August. The only time this gap has
been wider was during the rapid bear market declines of 2000-2 and 2008-9.
On the other hand, 2010 witnessed a very similar gap open up in the summer
months (-227 points in early July) but still saw the SPX beat its year end
target, embarrassing those who were pressured into cutting estimates
during the correction

2011 is therefore poised between a bullish repeat of last year and the
more troublesome examples of prior bear markets. Perhaps the answer to
this conundrum is that we may be witnessing both phenomena across
different sectors. We have no problem defining the financial sector as
being in the middle of a deep bear market, with little likelihood of the
2010 recovery peak being matched for a significant period of time.
Similarly many non-US markets have exhibited behavior much more typical of
the early months on long bear markets than brief "bull market corrections".
Within the US on the other hand, there are a significant number of sectors and
individual issues that have suffered only moderate damage to their 2009
recovery trend lines, and we remain fairly optimistic that new recovery highs
can be established within these areas once the current corrective phase is
behind us. - W-.SPXSTRAT_Index.gif -

| | # 
# Tuesday, 06 September 2011
Tuesday, September 6, 2011 2:13:25 PM

An interesting article that highlights a very important change in sentiment
amongst retail chains. New-store openings have been a notably absent factor in
the 2 year old economic recovery and while retail sales overall have remained
much more robust than most expected there has been a steady stream of new
supply from shuttered bank branches and companies that have lost out to
electronic sales (particularly in books, video and music). A change in this
dynamic would have broadly positive ramifications that would spread well beyond
the income statements of retail mall operators, and would also confirm our
positive stance on the US retail sector as a whole.



more...
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Lower Rents Driving U.S. Retailers to Expand, CB Richard Says
2011-09-06 16:44:36.968 GMT


By David M. Levitt
Sept. 6 (Bloomberg) -- More than half of U.S. retail chains
plan to open more stores because of lower rents, a report by CB
Richard Ellis Group Inc. found.
Fifty-nine percent of retailers surveyed said “compelling
rent levels” are encouraging them to expand, according to
Anthony Buono, executive managing director of CB Richard Ellis’s
retail services group for the Americas. The company, based in
Los Angeles, is the world’s largest commercial real estate
services firm.
“A significant number of retailers will be taking
advantage of an opportune time for growth,” Buono said in an e-
mailed statement. “Luxury goods, wholesale clubs and
discounters in particular are expected to continue to expand.”
Vacancies at U.S. regional malls and shopping centers rose
in the second quarter as the jobless rate remained above 9
percent and online competition grew, Reis Inc., a New York-based
real estate research company, reported in July. Rents at
regional and super-regional malls are down 5 percent since
peaking in the third quarter of 2008. At community and
neighborhood shopping centers, rents are 3 percent below their
peak reached in the second quarter of the same year.
The U.S. economy should regain momentum through the year,
according to CB Richard Ellis’s report. The “confluence” of
U.S. and European debt problems, turmoil in the Middle East,
destructive weather in the U.S. and Japan’s earthquake “has led
to a painfully slow recovery, but one that will not be
derailed,” Buono wrote.

Views of Economy

About 27 percent of retailers view the U.S. economy as
improving, compared with 35 percent a year earlier. The survey
showed 45 percent of retailers see the economy as stable, up
from 35 percent. Another 27 percent said recovery has already
occurred within their market segment.
Use of social networks is increasing, with 93 percent of
retailers saying they rely on services such as Facebook and
Twitter to market their products, up from 70 percent a year
earlier.
CB Richard Ellis’s annual survey of U.S. retailers was
taken during June and July. Of about 200 surveyed, 58 percent
are national retailers, 26 percent are global and 15 percent are
regional, according to the report.

For Related News and Information:
For Bloomberg’s Commercial Real Estate Overview: CRE <GO>
Top real estate stories: TOPR <GO>
New York real estate stories: TNI REL NYC <GO>
Bloomberg commercial real estate stories: NI CRE BN <GO>
Bloomberg commercial mortgage securities functions: CMBH <GO>
Bloomberg global real estate indexes: RMEN <GO>

--Editors: Christine Maurus, Kara Wetzel

To contact the reporter on this story:
David M. Levitt in New York at +1-212-617-4765 or
[email protected]

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Kara Wetzel at +1-212-617-5735 or
[email protected]

collapse
| | # 
Tuesday, September 6, 2011 12:16:53 PM

As we had expected, the long weekend took place against a backdrop of
sharply deteriorating conditions in the Euro-zone credit market with
Italian 10 year yields back at 5.50% and the France/Germany spread at -85
bp (see chart). This together with weak employment data on Friday has led
to not just equity weakness in today's US market but a substantial up-tick
in financial stress as well. Attached is a chart of the Bloomberg US
Financial Conditions Index (BFCIUS index) which some of our longer time
readers will recall was a constant reference point for us in 2008 & 2009.
This index takes an array of risk metrics (including the VIX, credit
spreads and swap spreads) and shows their collective standard deviation
from mean conditions. As can be seen, with the exception of the "generational
fat tail" of 2008/9, prior deep corrective phases have culminated with the
BFCIUS breaking through the -2 level. Last summer was an exception, but in
retrospect this was really simply a "profit scare" caused by an unusually
violent US data cycle, after the initial scare surrounding Greek sovereign
credit there was never any distress within non-equity markets, with most of
this concentrated on the US from July onwards.

2011 has been a much more damaging affair, at least outside of the US.
Equity losses in many countries are now well over 20% and clearly 2011 has
been the year in which Euro-zone credit has ceased to clear in the private
market without heavy central bank intervention. It is therefore
unsurprising that somewhat more stress has been visible in the BFCIUS index
which fell below -1.40 this morning (see attached chart). Our assumption
is that from this point on any deterioration in conditions outside the US
(both in the Euro-zone and emerging markets) will start to be transmitted
more forcefully to US asset markets (particularly credit markets) and that
the BFCIUS will end up much closer to the -2 level than it is today. As
troubling as this might seem, this would probably mark the beginning of
the terminal phase of this long corrective phase and create a good buying
opportunity for both US equities and HY credit (we do not see a repeat of
2008 taking place in the US).

We believe that global central banks are close to capitulating under the stress
of capital markets and note that the last week has seen surprising moves by
both Brazil and Switzerland, both of which are important but perhaps not first
tier central banks. The ECB remains the key to the current crisis we continue
to wonder how much more damage will need to be incurred within that region
before this institution changes its rigid stance on monetary policy. We are far
less interested in the actions of the FRB since the US already has very high
levels of liquidity (M2 growing over 10.2%) and extremely low rates across
the entire yield curve. There is little else that the FRB could establish
from any further monetary action at the current time. - W-BFCIUS_Index.gif -
euroyieildsep62011.gif

| | # 
Tuesday, September 6, 2011 10:19:59 AM

The ISM Non-Manufacturing Survey for August climbed to 53.3 from 52.7 in July,
allowing it to beat consensus estimates of 51.0. Underlying data was reasonably
robust with New Orders (52.8) and Business Activity (55.6) both staying in
positive territory. Backlogs remain slightly negative at 47.5 (up from 44.0)
and Employment just stayed in positive territory at 51.6 (52.5).

None of the above gives any hint of recession for the US service industry. On
the other hand the comfort to be drawn from this data is limited by the fact
that it has been quite late to indicate a deterioration of conditions over the
14 years of its existence. By itself, the release of this data is unlikely to
change the rapidly hardening consensus that the US has experienced a sharp
slowdown in growth but it still belongs in the positive side of the data ledger
where it has somewhat more company than many observers realize. -
ismnonmanaug2011.gif

| | # 
# Friday, 02 September 2011
Friday, September 2, 2011 9:12:26 AM

August's Non-Farm report would appear to confirm the worst fears regarding the
US economy but we would resist the urge to read too much into data that has a
history of massive fluctuation. Not that this will stop the marketplace
reaching its own conclusions, and we would expect a fairly violent reaction to
this data given that Europe was already showing signs of unraveling prior to
its release.

In terms of the report itself Total Payroll Change was estimated at 0K compared
to a consensus of 68K. Last month's data was also revised sharply lower to 68K,
with all revisions at the expense of Public Sector jobs. The Private Sector
payroll change fell to 17K vs. 95K consensus but this data was dragged lower by
45K because of the effect of the Verizon strike. Even so 62K would have been a
very weak month compared to last months 156K of Private Sector additions. This
month's data takes the 12 month ma of Private Sector payroll gains to 142.2K,
which remains at the low end of expansionary conditions. Note that it is not
uncommon for single month data (black dotted line) to approach zero during
periods of economic growth.

Interestingly the sector breakdown of job creation/losses shows a slowdown
across virtually all categories. Most will see this as confirmation that all
employers simply refused to hire in the face of uncertainty over economic and
political issues. There may be some truth in the notion that uncertainty
creates inertia but in our experience when a blanket change in data takes place
it is normally some heavy handed adjustment within the BLS that is causing the
data to shift dramatically. The business decisions that drive economic activity
simply do not operated in this simplistic manner, nor do economies act as a
single body across industry classifications. Furthermore a slowdown of this
magnitude would have shown up in some of the other employment metrics such as
Claims data or private sector surveys. Our assumption is that not for the first
time the Non-Farm Payroll report has taken a trend and exaggerated it out of
proportion.

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

U.S. Employment Change By Industry for August (Table)
2011-09-02 12:39:10.663 GMT


By Chris Middleton
Sept. 2 (Bloomberg) -- The following table shows the change
in employment by industry and the year-to-date figures for 2011.
*T
============================================================================
------------Growth in Payrolls------------
Aug. Year Chg 2 Yrs Ago 3 Yrs Ago
============================================================================
Total Nonfarm 0 1,259 1,170 -5,615
Goods Producing -3 294 -60 -3,168
Construction -5 4 -322 -1,591
Manufacturing -3 206 129 -1,601
Durable Goods -3 220 200 -1,118
Computer & Electronics 1 27 18 -115
Motor Vehicles and parts -3 12 55 -148
Private Service Providing 20 1,415 1,796 -1,832
Trade, transport -8 337 172 -1,297
Retail Trade -8 157 91 -665
Transportation & Warehousing -2 86 78 -244
Information -48 -80 -138 -345
============================================================================
------------Growth in Payrolls------------
Aug. Year Chg 2 Yrs Ago 3 Yrs Ago
============================================================================
Financial 3 -11 -110 -535
Business Services 28 500 822 -488
Computer Systems 8 72 102 71
Legal 0 0 -6 -45
Temp Help 5 150 495 -89
Leisure 2 165 161 -205
Education & Health Services 34 412 788 1,090
Educational Services -2 55 118 125
Health Care & Social Srvcs 36 358 671 966
Government -17 -450 -566 -615
Federal ex postal service 3 -75 74 178
State ex education 6 -63 -116 -141
Local ex education -6 -98 -231 -248
============================================================================
NOTE: All figures seasonally adjusted. Employment figures in thousands.
*T
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Labor {BLSW <GO>}

For Related News and Information:
For Non Farm Payrolls: NFP TCH <Index> HP<Go>
News on the U.S. labor market: TNI US LABOR <GO>
Stories on the U.S. economy: TNI US ECO <GO>
Stories on consumers: TNI US CONS <GO>

--Editor: Alex Tanzi

To contact the reporter on this story:
Chris Middleton in Washington at +1-202-624-1993 or [email protected]

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Marco Babic at +41 44-224-4112 or [email protected]
- nfppchaug11.gif

| | # 
# Thursday, 01 September 2011
Thursday, September 1, 2011 10:53:39 AM

As capital markets start to wind down ahead of the Labor Day weekend (although
tomorrow's NFP report will keep some activity going at least through the start
of trading) it is worth noting that Euro-zone yields have started to indicate a
moderate build up of stress once more.

As the attached chart shows, the Italian 10 year yield (black) has nudged higher
to 5.15%, its highest level since August 9th, while Spain's yield has stopped
improving at the 5.00% level. Any continued push higher by either countries'
debt yield will start to ring alarm bells. Meanwhile the spread between French
(blue) and German (green) yields has started to widen once more (see pink
line). This had recovered from almost -90 to -60 bp in mid August but has
started to move lower in recent days, reaching -72.7 bp today. This shows that
Euro-zone debt markets remains quite dislocated and the fact that Europe's
markets will be open on Monday creates some additional uncertainty for those
positioning themselves for the weekend. Our belief remains that this corrective
phase will not be behind us until the ECB has taken credible action to address
Euro-zone liquidity, although we would now treat any further downdraft in US
equities (particularly for the NDX index and retail stocks) as a buying
opportunity. - euroyieldssep12011.gif

| | # 
Thursday, September 1, 2011 10:25:31 AM

The August 2011 Manufacturing report came in at 50.6 compared to a consensus
expectation of 48.5. We had felt that this consensus expectation was
unrealistically low and are not surprised to see the data beat this and stay
above the key 50 level. Even so we would have hoped to have seen a somewhat
better number given the fact that the impact of the debt ceiling debate on this
data (primarily from federal contracts not being issued) should have
diminished. Even so this data is much better than the scary (and we believe
erroneous) data that emerged from some of the Regional Fed reports.

New Orders (red) remained just below 50 at 49.6 (49.2 last month). The current
level is not a concern but a further deterioration would be. Production (blue)
actually fell a little more to 48.6 (52.3) while Inventory (green) grew to 52.3
(49.3). Employment (pink) fell to 51.8 from 53.5. Interestingly the largest
drop came in Export Orders (see separate chart) which fell from 54 to 50.5, in
line with our belief that any softness being felt in the US originates from a
slowdown in activity outside this country.

What this month's report demonstrates is the continued importance of domestic
US retail sales (including car sales) for the US industrial sector. Fortunately
the early signs are that August has been another decent month for retailers,
even with the total loss of East Coast sales for the key last Saturday of the
month. Our view remains that betting on global growth makes much less sense
than concentrating a portfolio within the limits of the internal US economy.
- ismaugust2011.gif - ismexport.gif

| | # 
Thursday, September 1, 2011 8:41:46 AM

As we explained last week the US Initial Claims data had been effected by
the labor dispute at Verizon and the removal of this issue has led to a
fall back in Initial Claims to 409K from last week's revised figure of
422K. This moves the 4 week ma of claims up to 410.3K, but since 3 of
these weeks were boosted by the strike the true underlying number is close
to 400K. In any case we are far more interested in the behavior of this
index post Labor Day, when we suspect some financial sector layoffs will
hit, but be ameliorated by a much kinder seasonal adjustment process. We
still think it likely that Claims will push decisively below 400K by the
middle of Q4. Regardless of what tomorrow's NFP report comes up with, the more
reliable Initial claims data shows no significant deterioration in labor
markets has taken place in recent weeks. - D-INJCJC4_Index.gif -

| | # 
Thursday, September 1, 2011 7:03:12 AM

Brazil's central bank sprung a major surprise cutting the SELIC rate by 50
bp to 12.00% on Wednesday night. All 62 economists surveyed on Bloomberg had
predicted no change to the rate, while interest rate markets had anticipated a
fall of perhaps 25 bp by the turn of the year. It would seem that the central
bank has responded to the clear political pressure exerted earlier this week
and to the weakness of recent economic data and the plunge in the local IBOV
index.

This sudden action is very reminiscent of the Greenspan FRB which suddenly
cut rates in early January 2001 outside of the meeting schedule. The
reaction of asset markets to that earlier move is instructive, the SPX
index gained 5.01% on January 3rd following the announcement and the NDX
index a remarkable 18.77%. Forward motion then stopped fairly rapidly and
by late February these gains had been erased. A new corrective phase
ensued by late March saw both indexes sharply lower than their level
prior to the rate cut. Our view is that something similar will occur in
Brazil. Once a mature economic cycle is disrupted by monetary pressure
simply easing rates does not fix the problem. A full inventory and
distress cycle needs to be completed first. Lower interest rates may make
the adjustment process less painful and create the conditions for eventual
recovery but it takes a considerable period of time for this process to be
completed. We have used the SPX index from 2000 - 2002 as a reasonable
template for Brazil's current market for a number of weeks (see attached
chart). The unexpected cut in the SELIC certainly plays into this
comparison and we would be aggressive sellers into the inevitable sharp rally
which will follow this move. We had used the 60,000 level as a potential bear
market rally target for the IBOV index and this still seems like a reasonable
level to look for.

The other market to consider is that of currency. Although Brazil's
interest rates remain high after this cut, their direction is clearly lower
on a much more rapid trajectory than the market had anticipated. The BRL
had stopped making progress against the USD for most of the last 4 months
and may now actually start to show signs of weakness going forwards. -
D-BZSTSETA_Index.gif - ibovspx2000aug312011.gif

| | #