The PBOC released its credit and monetary data this morning completing a busy weekend for China watchers. This report showed that credit continues to expand rapidly, with the regulated banking sector once more being the dominant source of funding. On the monetary side of the equation M2 continues to grow rapidly while narrow money, both in terms of M0 and M1 appears to be lagging by a substantial degree, again underlining China's shift from a liquidity based financial system to a credit based system.
In terms of the data Aggregate "Social" Financing was exactly 1400 bln CNY, a suspiciously round number made more so by the fact that no breakdown of the data was provided apart from new Bank Loans, which totaled 787 bln. Both these data points were higher than expectations which were 1350 bln CNY and 675 bln CNY respectively. This keeps the 12 month ma of Social Financing at 1497 bln CNY, an annualized pace just under $3 trln per year. Bank loans made up a surprisingly high 56.2% of total financing but since we have no breakdown of other categories we cannot comment on the reason for this. Overall credit growth remains very strong, although it does lag the remarkable levels reached between Q4 2012 and Q1 2013.
The Monetary data showed that M2 continues to grow strongly, increasing 14.70% YoY to a 107.7 trln CNY ($17.7 trln, compared to US M2 of $10.9 trln). M1 on the other hand actually shrank slightly in September by -0.57%, taking the YoY growth back down to 8.90%, while M0, which typically surges in September for seasonal reasons, increased by only 2.87% in the month, taking the YoY growth rate down to 5.70%.
We have commented a number of times on the persistent lag of China's "narrow" money growth rates compared to "broad" money, since we believe that this represents a vital QUALITATIVE shift in the data which is not captured by simply looking at credit data alone. China's financial (and by extension economic) system has undergone a radical shift from one powered by domestic liquidity (which itself largely came from massive export growth) to one which is fueled by new credit issuance. Since the former dominates M1 and the latter M2 tracking the ratio of these measures generates a useful rough proxy of this transformation.
We have therefore attached a chart showing Chinese M1 as a percentage of M2 and for reference we have included the US equivalent. As can be seen although China's M1/M2 ratio is still high compared to the US it has been dropping rapidly in recent quarters. In our experience it is always the CHANGE in conditions rather than the LEVEL which matters, and in China's case this has been substantial enough to suggest some strains may be occurring, or be expected to do so within a matter of months.
From our perspective overall liquidity conditions in China are fairly tight, and although the economic effects of this can be masked for a while by strong credit growth in the end it is liquidity which tends to guide te future, particularly when, as in the case of China today, the profitability of much of the destination of credit is open to question.