+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
India's Economy Slows, With Global Implications
2012-05-30 07:55:10.929 GMT
By JIM YARDLEY and VIKAS BAJAJ; Jim Yardley reported from New
Delhi, and Vikas Bajaj from Mumbai, India.
May 30 (New York Times) -- NEW DELHI -- India's coalition
government just celebrated the third anniversary of its tenure
with a self-congratulatory banquet that could not have been more
poorly timed: India's currency, the rupee, is falling; investment
is down; inflation is rising; and deficits are eating away at
government coffers.
While short-term growth has slowed but not ground to a halt,
India's problems have dampened hopes that it, along with China
and other non-Western economies, might help revive the global
economy, as happened after the 2008 financial crisis. Instead,
India is now facing a political reckoning, as the country's
elected leaders must address difficult, politically unpopular
decisions -- or risk even deeper problems.
"When India was being run comparatively well in 2008, they
seemed to cope with these external shocks, at least from a
financial perspective," said Glenn Levine, a senior economist at
Moody's Analytics in Sydney, Australia. "I think people are
starting to question the long-term Indian story. That is the
difference now."
India's difficulties come as the global economy is wobbling
once again. Europe is grappling with a sovereign debt crisis that
could shatter the continent's economic and political union. The
United States is still not producing enough new jobs. China's
growth has weakened, with a real estate downturn and stalling
exports, while important emerging economies like Brazil are
slowing down, adding to pessimism about the world economy at a
critical time.
India is often viewed as a rising global powerhouse and, not
too long ago, Indian officials were predicting growth rates of 9
percent or higher. The Obama administration, eager to tap into
such a booming market and envisioning India as a regional
counterweight to China, trumpeted the United States-India
partnership. Some analysts even saw the global downturn as an
opportunity for India, making it more attractive for foreign
investors wary of putting money into declining advanced
industrial countries.
Today, India's economy is still expanding, with growth
projected between 6 percent and 7 percent this year. And analysts
say India's long-term strengths remain significant. It has one of
the world's youngest populations, and polls consistently show
they are overwhelmingly optimistic about their future. Meanwhile,
India's businesses are competing more aggressively on the global
stage.
But the slowdown has punctured the once bubbly mood in the
business and political classes and brought sharp criticism of the
government. Indian business leaders, foreign investors and
analysts say India's strengths are being undermined by growing
political dysfunction: the populist tendencies of Indian
politicians, a lack of action by top leaders and allegations of
corruption that have undermined the authority of policy makers.
India is desperate for investment in mining, roads, ports,
urban housing and other areas, but Indian businesses and foreign
investors are starting to shy away. Indian corporations, unable
to obtain governmental licenses or permissions for projects, are
investing overseas instead. Foreigners are also pulling back;
their investment in Indian stocks and bonds totaled only $16
billion in the last fiscal year, compared with $30 billion the
year before. The trend accelerated in recent months after the
Finance Ministry, trying to stem a rising budget deficit,
proposed a raft of new taxes on foreign institutions doing
business in India.
"A quiet crisis of confidence is building up," said Pratap
Bhanu Mehta, president of the Center for Policy Research in New
Delhi. "There is no certainty over the regulatory regime. There
is no certainty over the tax regime."
Indians have long thrived amid adversity, often by
creatively -- at times, illegally -- subverting onerous
regulations with a workaround ethos that has spurred economic
activity. Even today, industries like pharmaceuticals,
information technology and consumer goods, which do not need many
licenses and official approvals, are prospering. But those
sectors tied to the government, including mining, construction
and manufacturing, are struggling.
"We have consciously kept away from businesses where we
would have needed lots of permissions," said Ajay Piramal, who
heads a Mumbai-based conglomerate focused on pharmaceuticals.
At the core of the political uncertainties is the weakened
status of the Indian National Congress Party, which leads the
coalition government, known as the United Progressive Alliance.
Since 2004, the government has operated under an unorthodox
partnership between Sonia Gandhi, president of the Congress Party
and the governing coalition, and Manmohan Singh, her handpicked
prime minister.
The division of duties worked during the government's first
term. Mrs. Gandhi managed the coalition partners, rode herd on
the Congress Party, championed safety net programs for the poor
and oversaw election strategy; Mr. Singh, a quiet economist
considered a father of India's reform era, moved India closer to
the United States and oversaw a booming economy where growth
topped 9 percent.
In 2009, voters returned the U.P.A. to power amid
expectations that India, having shrugged off the 2008 global
recession, was on an inevitably upward growth track. But analysts
say the contradictions in the Singh-Gandhi partnership have since
been exposed. Mr. Singh holds the most politically powerful job
in the country, yet is seemingly reluctant to wield power and
often must seek approval on policy questions from Mrs. Gandhi.
She oversees an advisory panel largely consisting of social
activists that her critics regard as a shadow government.
The result has been a lack of a clear political agenda
emanating from the top, analysts and business leaders say,
allowing the bureaucracy to fall back into its traditional
resistance to making decisions. When officials do act, they often
change course after encountering political opposition.
"The last year was wasted," said Sanjaya Baru, a former
spokesman for the prime minister who is now at a research
institute. "We've had a crisis of leadership on the economic
side."
Moreover, the government has been on the defensive since a
series of corruption scandals, dormant for several years,
exploded into public view. Attempts by technocrats to push
through a so-called "second generation" of deeper economic
changes were undermined by the inability of the Congress Party to
corral its coalition partners.
In December, Mr. Singh's cabinet announced that foreign
retailers like Walmart would be allowed for the first time to
open stores in the country with local partners. But Mr. Singh was
forced to reverse course after an ally, Mamata Banerjee, the
chief minister of the state of West Bengal, balked and threatened
to bring down the government.
Then in March, facing pressures to raise revenues and stem
the rising fiscal deficit, Pranab Mukherjee, the finance
minister, released a budget that proposed new taxes on foreign
entities in India, including levies on past deals that the Indian
Supreme Court had ruled were not taxable in the country. Foreign
investors were stunned, and analysts say the outflow of capital
is one reason the rupee has tumbled 13 percent since the end of
February.
"We are fed up and our investors are not keen to even talk
about India," said a senior executive at an American bank in
Mumbai, asking not to be identified so he could speak bluntly.
"They are sick and tired."
Kaushik Basu, the government's chief economic adviser,
acknowledged that the government had made mistakes and had missed
opportunities to better position India as the global economic
landscape shifts. Yet he said that the rising pessimism was
unwarranted and that India was still growing, still had high
investment and savings rates, and should take advantage of the
depreciation of the rupee to push exports. He said India's
problems were no worse than those in other emerging economies.
"It is a difficult stage," Mr. Basu said in an interview.
"But I do remain very, very optimistic. Six months and we will
pull up."
In the meantime, the immediate challenges are piling up.
This month, in a move to raise revenues, the government raised
gasoline prices, drawing public fury. Now the question, analysts
say, is whether the administration can muster the political
courage to trim the bigger subsidies affecting diesel fuel and
cooking gas.
Mr. Singh warned last week that the government would have to
make some unpopular decisions. Many experts, however, say they
expect more stalemate.
"It has always been tough," said Mr. Levine, the Moody's
economist, "but there is a sense, at the moment, that it's too
difficult. For the time being people are just giving up on it."
-0- May/30/2012 07:55 GMT